Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oh Snap, another online vote to try and rig guys


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

If you were really going to rig one as much as I love X-clown (hell David used my quote off Twitter in his article) I would rather Rig the "Butt Fumble" which shouldn't have to be explained. 

But even more so to make ESPN's "Greatest NFL play of all time" the Butt Fumble would just be the perfect way to say FU to the 4 letter network. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were really going to rig one as much as I love X-clown (hell David used my quote off Twitter in his article) I would rather Rig the "Butt Fumble" which shouldn't have to be explained. 

But even more so to make ESPN's "Greatest NFL play of all time" the Butt Fumble would just be the perfect way to say FU to the 4 letter network. 

 

Oh I voted for the butt fumble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

X Clown was awesome.

 

The Beuerlein scramble in GB is up there too for me.

 

Unfortunately the rest of the fans around the NFL don't know either. That's what make plays like the Buttfumble so unique, everyone laughs at it. And yet the scoring of the TD isn't even that important on that play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to be as pragmatic and as un reactionary as possible. And once again multiple things can be true  His draft last year was disastrously terrible. X looks like an absolute bust. Brooks hasn't played. Wallace looks like a miss. But demani needs more pt, cws is solid and Coker has shown promise This draft cannot be judged after 2 games esp with a dc who doesn't want to play them. But tmac looks legit. Princely has promise. The rest is a ?  Has he made mistakes? Undoubtedly.  Is the roster better than it was 2 years ago? I'd say yes. I'd say our biggest problems are still the ones we had 2 years ago - Bryce and evero.  And as I've said before, at least he hasn't traded any future picks. Yet.  So IMHO Morgan is a mixed bag but not a total bust. Yet.
    • I'd rather have a raffle to pick a random fan to start at QB than see Bryce trot out there again. That actually sounds wildly entertaining. I'd actually MUCH rather have that. LOL 
    • I think being out on Dan is shortsighted; here are the two immediate reasons that stick out to me. 1) Inherited a grossly undersized QB with no real tangible physical traits that offset his size that the prior offensive staff did not want, who appears to be an all-time bust. Bryce isn't ''elite'' in any physical category, athleticism, arm strength, nothing, even his ''superpower'' aka his processing, does not show up. Not to mention that he is in his 3rd year and is still built like an HS senior. 2) The roster was terrible, the fact that we have halfway established some depth on both sides of the ball is commendable considering we are at the top of his 2nd year at the helm; we have not seen bad contracts handed out, and we've seen relatively smart trades. Even the Thielen one, because he's 35 and we got 4th round value for a guy who was not part of the long-term plans, did we miss him these past two games...sure. However, we were not a playoff team with him anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...