Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Madden 15 Ratings

Lilsmitty09

By Lilsmitty09,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

Positive points:

*AJ Klein is rated quite favorably.

*Star and Short are about right.

 

Biggest complaints:

*How is Silatolu only a 76?

*How on earth is Kony Ealy rated better than Mario Addison?

*All our backs (34, 28, 35) are WAY underrated in terms of catching. They should all be at least 75+ given how well they performed last season.

Other notes:

*O-line and secondary are as bad as I expected.

*Where are the kickers?

 

How would Amini be much higher than a 76?  What has he done?  He's still basically just potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LUUUUUKE Rookie

LUUUUUKE

Posted
Posted

I'm pretty sure that I said winning consistently in my 1st post. We had a winning season this year. The NFC South has not had a team to win the division back to back. Our media attention will change once we win consistently, year to year establishing a reputation of being and or becoming a winning organization. Until we can do that, we will get what we have from the media.

I'm so thankful for your invaluable insight. I'd surely be lost as a fan without it. Thank you very much Sir. Do you think you could give me tomorrow's winning lottery #s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

Except it's not, and I proved that, and you completely ignored it, because it's a known fact.

The Saints were the 21st ranked team in the NFL in the percent of plays rushing more than 4 guys.

If you're not first you're last.

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann89 Mentor

PantherPhann89

Posted
Posted

I'm so thankful for your invaluable insight. I'd surely be lost as a fan without it. Thank you very much Sir. Do you think you could give me tomorrow's winning lottery #s?

It's almost laughable how the Huddle attracts people that want to type ill words about some else's posts. Everything I said is common sense, consistent winning seasons attracts less negative media. This IS a forum and that is my insight. If you don't like my insight simply stop quoting my post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LUUUUUKE Rookie

LUUUUUKE

Posted
Posted

It's almost laughable how the Huddle attracts people that want to type ill words about some else's posts. Everything I said is common sense, consistent winning seasons attracts less negative media. This IS a forum and that is my insight. If you don't like my insight simply stop quoting my post.

Please tell me more all knowledgeable one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...