Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Right now, we're the 2002-2004 Falcons


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

The teams who were in the top half of the league last season in terms of rushing attempts were also the best teams for the most part including the teams that had the most playoff success. These teams also tended to have the top defenses in the league. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The teams who were in the top half of the league last season in terms of rushing attempts were also the best teams for the most part including the teams that had the most playoff success. These teams also tended to have the top defenses in the league. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

 

Valid.

 

That said, I want us to be balanced.  Not in the sense that we use an equal amount of passing and rushing, but in that we can effectively threaten teams either way.

 

Maybe we didn't have the personnel to do that before, but I'm hoping we do now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here's the thing on the Seahawks...

Seattle turned Wilson into a game manager. Yes, it worked, but Newton is too dynamic to be put in that sort of box and I don't think it'd be a wise use of his talents.

I disagree. He was a playmaker throughout the regular season and playoffs up until the Super Bowl (he just wasn't needed to make plays that game). Remember his touchdown against us week 1? We don't have to put Cam in a "box" to have a balanced offense. Yes Cam should be the focal point of the offense but this is a team game and we can't ignore the run. You are sounding more like a Cam fan than a Panthers fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. He was a playmaker throughout the regular season and playoffs up until the Super Bowl (he just wasn't needed to make plays that game). Remember his touchdown against us week 1? We don't have to put Cam in a "box" to have a balanced offense. Yes Cam should be the focal point of the offense but this is a team game and we can't ignore the run. You are sounding more like a Cam fan than a Panthers fan.

 

What I am is a Panthers fan that wants to see Newton used in the best way possible.

 

I'm not saying 'abandon the run' at all.  Like I said above, I want balance (the right kind).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I am is a Panthers fan that wants to see Newton used in the best way possible.

I'm not saying 'abandon the run' at all. Like I said above, I want balance (the right kind).

You mentioned how teams played defense against the Falcons by playing the run and forcing Vick to pass. Why wouldn't you want the same for us if we had an elite run game? Cam would be able to accept that challenge and beat them with his arm. I just think most Super Bowl teams have a foundation around the run game and defense. The exact way we were built last year and should be built this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it comes down to how much freedom Cam has at the line of scrimmage. If he sees an alignment that looks good to run on, run the ball. If he sees an alignment that looks good to pass on, pass the ball. I hate seeing a running play when there are 8 in the box, just because you want to impose your will.

If you see a D that looks like man, use that against them. If you see a D that looks to be stopping the run, use that against them.

I know Cam had some freedom last year. I guess I am hoping he can take that to another level. We cannot be afraid to take what the D gives us. We have more talent on Offense than we have had since Cam got here. Use it properly, and we should be tough to stop.

Give Cam the freedom to call what he sees. IMO, he has earned that right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...