Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Without Smith, Panthers ordinary

Rod Butsecks

By Rod Butsecks,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Rod Butsecks Newbie

Rod Butsecks

Posted
Posted

(By Tom Sorensen, [email protected]) When the Carolina Panthers begin practice Tuesday, I count 80 players on the field. Each shares two traits. They're good enough to get paid to come to training camp.p/ They're not Steve Smith.p/ Smith is the player the Panthers can least afford to lose. On many teams, the quarterback is. If Jake Delhomme goes down, his leadership will be missed much more than most fans realize. But Josh McCown will offer similar skills...

More...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
Posted

I disagree with this I think Kemo is the bigger loss. Before you bite my head off just listen to my argument. Last year we were 2-0 without smith. Jake had to make all his reads and not have to force the ball to one player. Sure smith is the most explosive player in the NFL IMO but he is still only one player. While I would give anything to keep him healthy his loss might not be as bad as we think. This might just be an opportunity to get Jarret our TE's and RB's more involved in the passing gameplan. Whereas when Kemo was out last year opposing teams could pretty much run right through us. The giants had 300 yards on the ground against us. IMO he is the bigger loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

The Panthers are a normal team with an outstanding offensive line and two great running backs. And a veteran quarterback who's had more success without Smith than Smith has had without him. And a pro-bowl middle linebacker. And a shutdown corner. And one of the best defensive ends in the league.

Other than that, they're pretty normal all right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted

One player does not make or break a team in football. Maybe in basketball, but not this sport. Writers need to stop being so dramatic when one good player goes down. Look at the Patriots...they lost Tom Brady, and still won 10 games. There are always guys who will step up. One side of the ball will make up for a loss on the other side of the ball. Football is a team sport...the ultimate team sport. It is completely unfair to judge 21 guys based on 1 guy being on the field. These writers need to get a life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I disagree with this I think Kemo is the bigger loss. Before you bite my head off just listen to my argument. Last year we were 2-0 without smith. Jake had to make all his reads and not have to force the ball to one player. Sure smith is the most explosive player in the NFL IMO but he is still only one player. While I would give anything to keep him healthy his loss might not be as bad as we think. This might just be an opportunity to get Jarret our TE's and RB's more involved in the passing gameplan. Whereas when Kemo was out last year opposing teams could pretty much run right through us. The giants had 300 yards on the ground against us. IMO he is the bigger loss.

you can't go by record alone. Smith was a big reason the run game has so much success and vice versa.....taking away that compliment would really hurt the team. Smitty did lead the NFL in recieving yards per game last season. Kemo missed the Giant game and they killed us.....we also missed our other starting DT that game and just happened to face what many considered the best running attack in the league that day. Smith is the most important piece to our offense. Kemo was important but he simply is just a very average DT at the end of the day....he was used to the best of his ability and that helped others on the defense (like the LBs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

And the year that Smitty was out with a broken leg, Moose led the NFC in touchdown catches.

We're so much more than just Steve Smith, but by the same token, we are so much a better team for having him. We can win games without him on the field, but man, when he's there he is a dyed-in-the-wool superstar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

And the year that Smitty was out with a broken leg, Moose led the NFC in touchdown catches.

We're so much more than just Steve Smith, but by the same token, we are so much a better team for having him. We can win games without him on the field, but man, when he's there he is a dyed-in-the-wool superstar.

We don't have that Moose anymore. We now have the 36 yr old model. Moose didn't get enough credit for exactly how good he was before he wasted away some good years in Chicago.

We can win games without him. The run game won't look like it did last year w/o him on the field and the passing game will lack a serious threat. Steve Smith is one of the best WRs in the game. Kemo will be missed but is replaceable....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Martin · Posted

      He gets the blame because his role as the QB is to make plays, help the team score more points and elevate players around him. He does none of that. Just because he didn’t massively mess up doesn’t mean he wasn’t a reason for the loss. The bar some of you have for Bryce is incredibly low.
    • strato
      Canales is holding us back

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Verge
      The Hall of Fame case for two different NFC South quarterbacks

      By Verge · Posted

      Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
×
×
  • Create New...