Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons to be on the Stephen Hill bandwagon


Jakob

Recommended Posts

Looking at the situation with the NY Jets it appears they have never committed to any of their receivers or QBs.

 

In 2012, the Jets trade up to get Stephen Hill.

 

He walks into the The Golden Calf of Bristol/Sanchez mess. He never has any consistency at QB in year 1. Then they draft Geno in year 2 and Geno struggles through preseason and they go with Geno at the last second of preseason. Then they tail back the passing game for Geno. Now you have Mike Vick in the picture.

 

He has had no consistency in the offensive system or offensive coordinators. Sparano year 1 and Mornhinweg in year 2.

 

The Jets had 7 receiving targets in 2013. None of the receivers topped 50 receptions. They had 3 TE with just as many receptions as the WR. And the RB was the #2 receiver with 36 receptions. In 2012, the Jets had 11 receiving targets with all but one of them under 30 receptions. They never committed to a receiving unit. Almost like receiving by committee. That is insane. How do you develop a young QB or young WR with that kind of garbage going on? Most teams will have about 3 to 5 players share the bulk of the receptions - not 11.

 

Hill catches the ball consistently. The biggest issue looks like his RAC. But I attribute that to their hellish situation with their passing game. Bring him in. He has more talent than all but Benjamin at the receiver position. If he can catch the ball consistently, then he is a perfect fit for the Panthers offense. It goes to the same reason I called for Benjamin in the draft. He fits Cam. Your receivers must be an extension of your QB not the other way around.

 

I would not be the least bit surprised if Proehl takes this kid under his wing and turns him into a #2 by the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They said Ginn couldn't catch, and he came here and did just fine. From what I've seen this guy doesn't have any trouble catching the ball, but his hands do look about as small as Donald Lafell's hands which is a bad sign.

 

 

6'4",  215lb of muscle, runs a 4.36 40, young and has a lot to prove. That has to be better than the slow washed up WRs we have now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...