Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What we learned about today's game against Tampa Bay


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Rivera needs to stay away from his former self. Playing for a FG right before halftime was unacceptable.

Shula is still Shula. Calling failed plays time after time and wtf plays on 3rd down is what keeps points off the board. Yes he has good streaks, but that's it. Every drive he has at least a couple plays that leave you thinking "wtf?". He is the major thorn in the offense's side.

We really need Cam. If he is not on IR, you really have to question that he should've started this week. Fractured ribs isn't something that is going to feel better in a week. Makes me think Rivera reverted back to his overly cautious self. You need your best players on the field during division games. They count too much. You aren't guaranteed anything in the NFL.

Godfrey is terrible. Needs to be replaced asap.

Philly Brown looked more confident today than he did all preseason. Hopefully he keeps this up.

DWill still has it!

Our defense, although got a little soft after halftime, is still solid. Didn't look too bad for a first game. Can only only get better from here on out.

We can not rely on Luck and terrible QB play from the opposition every game. We need to fix the things above. I have a feeling if we were playing a more competent team, the outcome would be much different. Being conservative costs you games. We were lucky to come out of this with a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly the Bucs got way more lucky than we did.

 

2 of McClowns passes that helped them score were like WTF LOL prayers that got answered....and then that late hit call....such bs.

I saw Mike Evans clearly pull down a guy from behind while McCown ran for the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WR's can catch.

Olsen is getting better and Better.

The defense is possibly better than last season.

The OLine is very average, but serviceable against "good" DLines. 

RB's underperform for their pay, but can make plays.

 

 

The game plan shouldn't be judged too harshly. 

How much would YOU air it out with your backup QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...