Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Around the Horn called for Hardy's suspension


Fiz

Recommended Posts

This is important because Around the Horn is the marquee editorial voice of the largest sports media organization in the world.

 

When they lean, they lean hard. 

 

Regardless of what you think about the case, nicole holder, the judge, or 300 years of jurisprudence, now the weight of public opinion is leaning on Jerry Richardson.

 

 

Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon the Interruption is also calling for it, suspension with pay.  Yet the thing I keep trying to grasp my head around is, they are essentially saying Hardy IS guilty.  They don't care about what was said in the trial or any of that.  They don't care that Hardy has a great chance of being found not guilty, I believe.  They are pretty much stating he's guilty.  I mean PTI even mentioned they read the transcripts, and they are horrified.  I'm asking myself 'Did they really read the transcripts?'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon the Interruption is also calling for it, suspension with pay. Yet the thing I keep trying to grasp my head around is, they are essentially saying Hardy IS guilty. They don't care about what was said in the trial or any of that. They don't care that Hardy has a great chance of being found not guilty, I believe. They are pretty much stating he's guilty. I mean PTI even mentioned they read the transcripts, and they are horrified. I'm asking myself 'Did they really read the transcripts?'.

Oh fug pti is what I meant.

I'm drunk whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol, what?

Hardy has appealed his case which your legally allowed to do. Goodell allegedly lied about the existence of damaging evidence. For the life of me I don't see how one has anything to do with the other.

 

You know for a fact that Goodell lied and he is not legally entitled a fair "hearing" like Hardy eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...