Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Hardy is found Innocent we really need to reconsider letting him go


t96

Recommended Posts

If you watched that game and thought the absence of Greg Hardy was the sole difference maker, then well I think we were watching 2 different games.

 

Never said it was "the sole difference maker" but with Hardy they don't run for 275 yards against us. With Hardy they don't even run for 100 yards against us. That running gave them ball control and made our defense tired. If we could've stopped there run with Hardy we could've controlled the ball and clock and made their defense tired and ours wouldn't have been. Without that 81 yard Bell run which Hardy would've stopped, they don't get all that momentum. Yes there were a lot of other factors to us losing but if we had Hardy we would've overcome those and won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think hardy has the presents of mind to get in the passing lane of those screens, also think he would have did a better job collasping the gap and helping with the run.......Hard would have made a big difference in this game

 

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think hardy has the presents of mind to get in the passing lane of those screens, also think he would have did a better job collasping the gap and helping with the run.......Hard would have made a big difference in this game

I think a lot of people around here underestimate how important he was to our defense last year. There is a reason the GM and coaches felt like he was worth franchising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...