Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spiderman Connected to MCU

PandaPancake

By PandaPancake,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Crixtala Collaborator

Crixtala

Posted
Posted

Marvel Wanted Spider-Man to Appear in ‘Captain America: Civil War’

Ever since Marvel started its own studio – and subsequently became the most popular studio producing Marvel Comics movie adaptations – there have been fans clamoring for Sony to give up the rights to Spider-Man so he could mix it up with the likes of Robert Downey Jr.’s Iron Man and Chris Evans’ Captain America.

In lieu of a rights reversal, though, fans have also hoped that Sony’s Spider-Man – played by Andrew Garfield – might cross over into the Marvel movie universe for an event film in the vein of The Avengers. There have even been rumors along these lines, claiming that, as a result of the critical lashing The Amazing Spider-Man 2 received (combined with the fact that it made the least amount of money of all five Spider-Man films), Sony was talking to Marvel about possibly lending the latter studio everyone’s favorite webslinger.

Those rumors? All true, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Sony needs to let this happen.  Spider-Man is important and Marvel would do a better job with him.

 

I wish I could wake up one morning and Marvel have rights to everything, X-Men, Spidey, FF4, and even the odd stuff with Namor.

 

Could get some amazing stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I've heard rumors that talks are happening to share him. I'm kind of meh towards Spiderman after Sony's work on him. I always preferred the Scarlet Spider.

Now if we could get a Deadpool crossovers that would be great. Spiderman and Deadpool or Deadpool vs The Marvel Universe.

Edit: I remembered another one, Deadpool and Galactus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Word is Marvel will select a new Spiderman for the MCU and thus would result in another Spiderman movie reboot.......

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/12/if-marvel-gets-spider-man-it-wont-be-the-andrew-garfield-kind

At this point Spiderman is like Batman. Everyone knows the story. I know people who don't know the difference in your and you're but they know Thomas and Martha Wayne were Bruce's parents and their murders motivated him to become Batman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

It just kills me that the rights are split. Marvel needs all of it's character's rights back. X-men and Spidey especially. FF4 has always just been "eh" to me, so I don't care there either way.

Sony has ruined both X-men and Spidey with bad films and bad continuity (they've literally killed and brought back to life every character in the X-men at least once due to shortsightedness). Spidey has had 2 reboots, and both have failed. Though, I enjoy Garfield's version of Spider-Man more than that abomination that is the first trilogy with Toby McGuire. Hell, I enjoyed The Amazing Spider-Man 2 for the most part. Just feel they tried to do too much in one movie and it felt convoluted and rushed a bit when it didn't need to be...just like Spider-Man 3. Introducing too many characters with weak/no motivation to oppose Spider-Man and not really fleshing out the villain as well as they could have.

Let Marvel have it's characters so we can see more epic movies and less crappy movies.

All this being said, anything DC does in movies or television is going to top Marvel for me personally. Marvel is geared towards kids more than adults, and the kids are going to drag the parents along. That's how they get their numbers. DC is written more towards the adult crowd (I mean, just compare the comics...I think it's fairly obvious which crowd is supposed to appreciate it/read it more), and they do a better job of engaging the human element to the heroes and villains. So, as long as Batman vs Superman isn't royally screwed up and Arrow and Flash continue to be as great as they have been, I'll be plenty happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

It just kills me that the rights are split. Marvel needs all of it's character's rights back. X-men and Spidey especially. FF4 has always just been "eh" to me, so I don't care there either way.

Sony has ruined both X-men and Spidey with bad films and bad continuity (they've literally killed and brought back to life every character in the X-men at least once due to shortsightedness). Spidey has had 2 reboots, and both have failed. Though, I enjoy Garfield's version of Spider-Man more than that abomination that is the first trilogy with Toby McGuire. Hell, I enjoyed The Amazing Spider-Man 2 for the most part. Just feel they tried to do too much in one movie and it felt convoluted and rushed a bit when it didn't need to be...just like Spider-Man 3. Introducing too many characters with weak/no motivation to oppose Spider-Man and not really fleshing out the villain as well as they could have.

Let Marvel have it's characters so we can see more epic movies and less crappy movies.

All this being said, anything DC does in movies or television is going to top Marvel for me personally. Marvel is geared towards kids more than adults, and the kids are going to drag the parents along. That's how they get their numbers. DC is written more towards the adult crowd (I mean, just compare the comics...I think it's fairly obvious which crowd is supposed to appreciate it/read it more), and they do a better job of engaging the human element to the heroes and villains. So, as long as Batman vs Superman isn't royally screwed up and Arrow and Flash continue to be as great as they have been, I'll be plenty happy. 

 

Well Fox owns X-Men, and anything associated like Deadpool, etc.  They also own FF4.  The X-Men movies have been good minus Last Stand.  The last two were really great IMO, so I don't worry there.  FF4..... well we'll see.

 

Sony has Spidey and it's almost been meh to me.  I think the issue with Spider-Man and movies might be, he's better as a supporting character, much like Hulk emerged to be in Avengers.  Spider-Man rocking it out with the rest of the cast would be great and in small doses (his humor, goofyness, etc).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • CRA
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By CRA · Posted

      Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...