Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera: "Greg will be here at the right moment/appropriate time"


cbully

Recommended Posts

You're assuming he'll be found guilty. I think the chances of that are very slim.

If anybody actually took the time and read the testimony in the case. They could see it's a good chance that 12 people won't see eye to eye on this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anybody actually took the time and read the testimony in the case. They could see it's a good chance that 12 people won't see eye to eye on this case.

 

 

So reasonable doubt would exist? If only criminal trials mentioned this somewhere

 

You don't even need reasonable doubt in this case.  It would be unreasonable to believe her story is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should have already been back. Never should have left. I hate that we, as an organization, rolled over. San Fran didn't. I'm sure we will still have sellouts with him on the roster.

SF and Carolina isn't apples to apples. Hardy already was charged and went to court and found guilty. Yes, NC law techically wipes that away when he appeals but it is still something Hardy has against him in the court of public opinion with his charge that the SF player doesn't have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SF and Carolina isn't apples to apples. Hardy already was charged and went to court and found guilty. Yes, NC law techically wipes that away when he appeals but it is still something Hardy has against him in the court of public opinion with his charge that the SF player doesn't have

I know . Just wondering why all the pitchforks were put away tonight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes no sense. If he is found innocent he plays. Due process would have played out and he could suit up.

 

 

"While criminal activity is clearly outside the scope of permissible conduct, and persons who engage in criminal activity will be subject to discipline, the standard of conduct for persons employed in the NFL is considerably higher. It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. Instead, as an employee of the NFL or a member club, you are held to a higher standard and expected to conduct yourself in a way that is responsible, promotes the values upon which the League is based, and is lawful."
 
I think he'll be suspended even if he's found innocent, but I certainly hope not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

does any one else not give af about what the media thinks? Idk how they got so much power, but its fudging ridiculous. They are a bunch of dumb asses that don't even know the story. I can't believe we are letting the media steal wins from us bc they think hardy did the same thing ray rice did. Richardson should be suing these fudging idiots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...