Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

34 defense: a solution to a problem


Ruff

Recommended Posts

This thread isn't about our struggles against the 34 defense. Actually, it's about our own struggles to get pressure on the quarterback.

Right now, we're suffering because of Greg Hardy being out, among other things. My solution, move our defense to the 34 defense, because i believe we have the pieces to run it effectively.

Say what?!

Think about it. We get 0 pressure from our ends because of the lack of pressure the DTs are getting. However, KK is getting a fair amount of push. Set him and Star up as the DE/DTs of the 34, and let them pass rush from inside. Use Colin Cole as the NT, and let Edwards come in and refresh Star, and let Star move inside to the NT when Cole gets tired.

But what about Johnson? Well, Johnson can spell KK, because I think Short is the better of the two players right now.

Moving on, Kuechly and Klein could both start at the ILB position. Kuechly being the read and react ILB, responsible for the RB (think Willis) and Klein becomes the blitzing ILB. Davis can either pass rush or cover the TE from the OLB position.

But what about the stand up DE?

Wes Horton.

That's right. Horton has the speed to rush freely off the outside, but not the moves or power to rush from a stance. Let him roam out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While you were adding more, I was editing my post...to talk about than more.

Lol.

I think Horton is truly key to the OLB position on this team. He played a similar position as Nick Perry at USC, who is now playing OLB for Green Bay.

The 34 would also give us the ability to need not rely on a nickel so muh, since Davis could cover the slot receiver within a certain zone, as could Kuechly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly it's not like flipping a light switch.

It's more like converting an engine from manual transmission to automatic. It seems like they're similar, but the moving pieces are very different. And if you want to do that anyway, you're better off buying a new car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread isn't about our struggles against the 34 defense. Actually, it's about our own struggles to get pressure on the quarterback.

Right now, we're suffering because of Greg Hardy being out, among other things. My solution, move our defense to the 34 defense, because i believe we have the pieces to run it effectively.

Say what?!

Think about it. We get 0 pressure from our ends because of the lack of pressure the DTs are getting. However, KK is getting a fair amount of push. Set him and Star up as the DE/DTs of the 34, and let them pass rush from inside. Use Colin Cole as the NT, and let Edwards come in and refresh Star, and let Star move inside to the NT when Cole gets tired.

But what about Johnson? Well, Johnson can spell KK, because I think Short is the better of the two players right now.

Moving on, Kuechly and Klein could both start at the ILB position. Kuechly being the read and react ILB, responsible for the RB (think Willis) and Klein becomes the blitzing ILB. Davis can either pass rush or cover the TE from the OLB position.

But what about the stand up DE?

Wes Horton.

That's right. Horton has the speed to rush freely off the outside, but not the moves or power to rush from a stance. Let him roam out there.

 

I've thought about this too, but I think Addison would be a better stand up DE then Horton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already run some variations of a 3-4 making it a hybrid, we definitely don't have the secondary to consistently run a 3-4 due to the amount of man coverage that is necessary to successfully run this defense. 

 

I believe you...but perhaps we could get more pressure than we're generating now which may mitigate some of the pass coverage issues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...