Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sherman on KB


*FreeFua*

Recommended Posts

@jjones9: Sherman on Benjamin: We were there in coverage &we were right on top of him. He made plays. He's going to grow...and do well in this league

I was hoping he'd say something like this after today's game. KB had a solid game today matched up against Sherman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just imagine... had he caught that TD, we most likely would've won AND everyone would be talking about him. Instead, the only reason our game will be mentioned is that it "turned around Seattle's season."

Yep, he should've had it too. But he's a rookie and that stuff is going to happen. That's why I want another WR brought in, take off some of the pressure on KB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know KB has a lot to learn, but it really does seem like we are underutilizing him, especially in the red zone and short/medium yardage situations.  One would think we could get him 6-8 targets a game from just running 10 yards and turning around since there wouldn't really be anything the defense could do about it and it wouldn't require our oline to pass protect any better than they are currently doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, he should've had it too. But he's a rookie and that stuff is going to happen. That's why I want another WR brought in, take off some of the pressure on KB

 

I've actively tried to avoid the subject for a few weeks now, but I have to say...  We HAD that WR on the roster until Gettleman decided he was no longer essential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, he should've had it too. But he's a rookie and that stuff is going to happen. That's why I want another WR brought in, take off some of the pressure on KB

 

i don't think benjamin is under enough pressure.

 

the more i see benjamin play, the more i'm convinced he would really benefit from having the offense put on his shoulders.

 

the next offensive play after him missing the sure td catch should have been another pass right to him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think benjamin is under enough pressure.

the more i see benjamin play, the more i'm convinced he would really benefit from having the offense put on his shoulders.

the next offensive play after him missing the sure td catch should have been another pass right to him.

Agreed. When I said pressure I meant defenses game planning for him, Sherman covering him type thing. If we brought in a guy like VJax, Benji would then come out 1B receiver and have things open up for him a bit. I think it'd really help his development as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...