Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL's Greatest Games Superbowl 38


TheMaulClaw

Recommended Posts

KB will end up being our new moose times ten. We will get a more traditional number one in the upcoming draft

 

Not sure about that completely.  Smitty gets all the love but Moose would probably be our best WR all time if not for his Chicago years.  Still blows my mind he never missed a game with us due to injury.  Moose leaves and we suck and as soon as he comes back we're good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was so young then. 3rd grade I think. I cried after that game and was so heartbroken. Not to mention I was watching the game with an obnoxious anti-panther football fan

 

i was high school age but i remember all the pats fans coming out of the woodwork

 

the worst was this jackass masshole my mom worked with.  would not shut up about his pats.  his dad had waxed floors or something at hahvahd so he considered himself an ivy leaguer.  dead serious that's the kind of guy he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about that completely.  Smitty gets all the love but Moose would probably be our best WR all time if not for his Chicago years.  Still blows my mind he never missed a game with us due to injury.  Moose leaves and we suck and as soon as he comes back we're good.

 

lol it's not like the single greatest receiving season in franchise history or something happened in his absence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol it's not like the single greatest receiving season in franchise history or anything happened in his absence

 

Doesn't matter we sucked in 2006 and 2007....well extremely average.  Not disputing Smitty's greatness here, just saying Moose is right there and was a better blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...