Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do you need to run a West Coast offense?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Since we're discussing different systems and coaches lately, I thought it'd be useful to look at the sorts of things you need to effectively run a West Coast type attack.

 

Let's look at it by position...

 

QUARTERBACK: The QB in a WCO needs to be an accurate short passer, but ability to throw deep - while not absolutely necessary - does make the offense more effective.  He also needs to make good decisions, and make them quickly. He should have good 'touch' on his passes, and it's definitely best that he be mobile because the system doesn't usually keep runningbacks in to block, preferring to send them out in pass patterns.

 

RUNNINGBACK: West Coast RBs definitely have to be versatile.  They should be just as big a threat catching passes out of the backfield as they are rushing.  On run plays, you want a decisive 'hit the hole' type and a back who can 'be his own blocker' helps as well.  The best WCO systems also tend to have at least one big back on the roster to get the 'tough yards', someone you can use by spreading the field out and running him up the middle or off tackle.

 

RECEIVER: Good (preferably great) route runners.  Great hands (as few drops as possible since in this system the short pass often subs for the run, essentially becoming a 'long handoff').  And a big key here, speed and elusiveness.  You want the super shifty type of guy who can take a three yard pass and turn it into a ten yard (or more) gain.  Also a great idea to have at least one big receiver who's a red zone threat and will fight for the ball when covered.

 

TIGHT END: The tight end in the WCO is generally a security blanket and a chain mover.  As your primary 'possession guy, you absolutely need someone with ultra-reliable hands and preferably one who's good at finding open spots in coverage.  If he's also a 'stretch the field' type, that's good too but reliability is what's paramount.  Also extremely helpful if he's good in the red zone.

 

OFFENSIVE LINE: Since the WCO commonly uses zone blocking schemes, athletic linemen tend to work best.  That's not to say you can't have big bruisers (Baltimore does) but they need to be able to move well and - arguably even more important - they need to be very smart.  Each guy needs to understand what the guy next to him is doing and be able to diagnose what's coming at him and react quickly.

 

So looking at this list now, if we wanted to run this kind of scheme, what would you say we have already and where would we need to retool?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panfanman Experienced

panfanman

Posted
Posted

Well, our QB is mobile for sure. But has no finesse on his passes and really does not make quick enough decisions on passes.

Our currently line I'm not sure works in any system. Lol

Olsen would be a good WCO TE.

I think the receivers on the roster wood be adequate as would the RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

Well, our QB is mobile for sure. But has no finesse on his passes and really does not make quick enough decisions on passes.

Our currently line I'm not sure works in any system. Lol

Olsen would be a good WCO TE.

I think the receivers on the roster wood be adequate as would the RBs.

Oak or monogamy?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

One other element that came up in a separate thread...

 

The Shanahan way involved the kind of low 'cut blocking' that Broncos linemen became infamous for in his tenure.  When former Shanahan assistant Alex Gibbs became the OL coach in Atlanta, we saw a lot of it against us, and generally screamed about it as dirty.

 

Would you be comfortable with our line doing that kind of blocking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panfanman Experienced

panfanman

Posted
Posted

Friend of mine (full disclosure: non-Panther fan but watches the games because he lives here) who likes the WCO thinks that Philly Brown is actually better suited to be a number one receiver in that kind of system than Kelvin Benjamin.

Does he have a point?

I actually thought the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

Philly's skill set is better for WCO offense than KB's skill set, but I don't think at this point he'd actually be a more effective or better player. KB is miles ahead of Philly in a lot of areas. Philly should be starting opposite KB though, and should've been every single game that he was healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bandu Experienced

bandu

Posted
Posted

the two main issues are LT and WR for us operating an effective WCO.draft well or acquire quality free agents to address these two areas of concern and we should be fine.btw,here are two collegiate players that fit the mold, Stanfords,Andrus Peat and Ty Montgomery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CarolinaRideorDie
      So.. anyone remember Matt Kallil

      By CarolinaRideorDie · Posted

      In all honesty, he should probably get that checked out. It might be (Arnold Schwarzenegger voice) "a tuuumaaa" 
    • LinvilleGorge
      Vet QB Options - Trade/Cut/FA Edition

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Ah yes, my bad. It's easy to forget those handful of games Frank coached. LOL 
    • Bear Hands
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion in Here)

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      I've seen the comp a few times, and I feel there is a lot to it. Our situation is a lot like Kansas City was pre-Mahomes (without the HOF HC) Whether you like them or not, D&D are building something here.  They had a strong draft.  The team is slowly coming together, developing some identity, and has some decent blue chip parts.  Brown, Horn, McMillan, and a good OL situation that we should keep fortifying every year.  It's not much yet, but growing.    Bryce is in that Alex Smith spot.  A top draft pick, has never been overly impressive, but you can win games when he's safe with the ball.  You're not winning because of him - maybe once in a blue moon.  From time to time he's shown the ability to orchestrate some plays and lead drives.  I just don't see anything that is like - "oh snap, yeah don't let him go, he's ours".  He'll make a solid/good throw every now and again, but man, it is a struggle a lot of the time to watch.  Some terrible performances to speak of, heck he's already been benched once during year 2.      He should in no way preclude you from flirting with what else is out there.  This is not a marriage.  If you're in position (or trade range) for a guy you REALLY like come draft day, you shoot your shot. If we are in the draft process, and suddenly realize QB3-4 is a guy we really like, that's when you make a modest jump from like 16 to 11 or something like that.  Just like the Bills did for Allen, like the Chiefs did for Mahomes.  This is nothing magical that plants this franchise savior title on them, this is not some stupid trade-- it's an easy trade up to get a guy you like w/a big ceiling.  It's all player dependent and coaching/development driven.  If we don't like a QB, by all means fortify the front-7, get an awesome OLB or ILB prospect.   But we're on year 3, you kind of know what you're getting at this point.  Mostly sub-200 yard performances, low YPA, bad technique, poor mechanics, some decent stuff sprinkled in, but some bad turnover heavy ones that kill the team's momentum.  Again, run with him if there's no complete disaster that happens the remainder of the season, but don't close the door on something better just because of the investment or debatable performances.     
×
×
  • Create New...