Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players vs System


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So how have teams like the Steelers and the Patriots maintained success over long periods of time while other - even well run - teams seem to be up and down?

 

How do guys like Justin Forsett, who prior to this season looked maybe slightly above average, suddenly start looking like stars?

 

Why do guys like Kevin Kolb look good in one place and then suddenly regress when they go to a new team?

 

The answer?  It's the system.

 

Many teams (and probably most fans) follow the thinking that the secret to building a great team is as simple as going out and signing the best players.  The problem with that, and even with drafting great players, is that at some point those guys can get expensive. And as we saw with last year's tackle market, the price all too often exceeds the quality.

 

Now, certainly nobody's interested in signing bad players, but the most successful teams are the ones that build effective systems that allow them to 'plug and play'.  They sign guys who fit what they do more so than guys who just had great stats in a contract year.

 

The surest signs of a team like that?  The before and after.

 

By 'before' I mean you see players that didn't seem like world beaters in their prior jobs suddenly come in and look great.  Everyone starts saying "Wow, where did this guy come from?"

 

The 'after'?  That's when you watch a guy who looked like a king clean up with a big contract elsewhere, then promptly go to his new team and suck.  Then everyone starts saying "Man, what happened?  He used to be good."

 

Andy Reid's a prime example of this.  His offensive system can take a guy like Alex Smith and make him go from bust to boom.  On defense, you have guys like Dick LeBeau who are still able to run effective defenses even as their teams let players walk for big contracts elsewhere.

 

I'm hoping that the next time we're looking for a head coach (which I'd like sooner rather than later) we pick someone who has an idea how to build a system that gives us the flexibility to let players just looking for huge paydays walk along with the ability to go 'next man up' and make it look seamless.

 

The question of course then becomes who might be able to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're into week 13 and I still don't have a clue as to what system we're trying to run. There's a huge problem in that we look so Jekyll and Hyde from week to week, that it has to mess with our players' heads constantly.

 

 

Personally, I think we're trying to run the "Keystone Kapers" system in both offense an defense, but I can't be sure. Can anyone confirm this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you that the system is larger than the players.

 

Coaching, and QB play in the NFL is paramount, with coaching being more important in this league than any other.

 

Absolutely.

 

Drafting is too.  You have to be able to scout and draft players that fit your system very well if you want the 'next man up' machine to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're into week 13 and I still don't have a clue as to what system we're trying to run. There's a huge problem in that we look so Jekyll and Hyde from week to week, that it has to mess with our players' heads constantly.

 

 

Personally, I think we're trying to run the "Keystone Kapers" system in both offense an defense, but I can't be sure. Can anyone confirm this?

 

 

I don't know if our current coaching staff thinks on a high enough level to even craft a system like we're discussing here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely.

 

Drafting is too.  You have to be able to scout and draft players that fit your system very well if you want the 'next man up' machine to work.

 

Totally agree with you.

 

We, as a fan base has to "grow up" and quit freaking out every time we let a star go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if our current coaching staff thinks on a high enough level to even craft a system like we're discussing here.

 

 

Under no circumstances.  

 

 

In my opinion, it goes back to coaches like RR, Norv, LeBeau, etc.....being some of the best X and O guys in the business, but can't/won't create a system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree with you.

 

We, as a fan base has to "grow up" and quit freaking out every time we let a star go.

 

We discussed that a while back.

 

Every time we release a player a good portion of the commenters are certain we just let go of a budding star.  They're all but guaranteed to catch on elsewhere (usually with the Patriots) and make us pay.

 

Imagine the brouhaha if they dump Stephen Hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how have teams like the Steelers and the Patriots maintained success over long periods of time while other - even well run - teams seem to be up and down?

How do guys like Justin Forsett, who prior to this season looked maybe slightly above average, suddenly start looking like stars?

Why do guys like Kevin Kolb look good in one place and then suddenly regress when they go to a new team?

The answer? It's the system.

Many teams (and probably most fans) follow the thinking that the secret to building a great team is as simple as going out and signing the best players. The problem with that, and even with drafting great players, is that at some point those guys can get expensive. And as we saw with last year's tackle market, the price all too often exceeds the quality.

Now, certainly nobody's interested in signing bad players, but the most successful teams are the ones that build effective systems that allow them to 'plug and play'. They sign guys who fit what they do more so than guys who just had great stats in a contract year.

The surest signs of a team like that? The before and after.

By 'before' I mean you see players that didn't seem like world beaters in their prior jobs suddenly come in and look great. Everyone starts saying "Wow, where did this guy come from?"

The 'after'? That's when you watch a guy who looked like a king clean up with a big contract elsewhere, then promptly go to his new team and suck. Then everyone starts saying "Man, what happened? He used to be good."

Andy Reid's a prime example of this. His offensive system can take a guy like Alex Smith and make him go from bust to boom. On defense, you have guys like Dick LeBeau who are still able to run effective defenses even as their teams let players walk for big contracts elsewhere.

I'm hoping that the next time we're looking for a head coach (which I'd like sooner rather than later) we pick someone who has an idea how to build a system that gives us the flexibility to let players just looking for huge paydays walk along with the ability to go 'next man up' and make it look seamless.

The question of course then becomes who might be able to do that.

Well Alex Smith was the # 1 pick and had like the highest passer rating in the NFL at the time he was replaced by Kaepernick. He was never the bust he was made out to be, just a product of poor coaching. So if anything Jim Harbaugh deserves the credit for turning his career around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Alex Smith was the # 1 pick and had like the highest passer rating in the NFL at the time he was replaced by Kaepernick. He was never the bust he was made out to be, just a product of poor coaching. So if anything Jim Harbaugh deserves the credit for turning his career around.

 

Then why didn't they keep him?

 

Smith is playing in Andy Reid's system now. Reid's offense could make me look like a good quarterback.  That's why I laugh every time a team trades for a QB that looked good playing for Reid. I know it's only a matter of time before they're saying "This makes no sense!  He looked so good before! What happened?" :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...