Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, if we win the South, who do we host?


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

I had that same thought today, was ready to post a thread but didn't want to get ahead of myself.  

 

We win out, Saints lose one of three...AZ loses to Sea next week.  It could very well happen.  

 

Eagles are the ones on the outside looking in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season has been totally bizarre. I don't know that I will ever recover from the AZ game, but beating them in the playoffs would help a lot.

 

Go Bears. This will be the first time I've ever cheered for the Bears, and the experience will just add to this odd season. fug the Saints with a hairy bear pecker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

That's amazingly plausible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

 

While I like this scenario, don't underestimate the Panther's tendency to let backup QB's look like Pro Bowlers. See Mark Sanchez 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had that same thought today, was ready to post a thread but didn't want to get ahead of myself.  

 

We win out, Saints lose one of three...AZ loses to Sea next week.  It could very well happen.  

 

Eagles are the ones on the outside looking in.  

Az loses to Sea next week me thinks.  Chicago wins tomorrow.  The Illuminati have their agenda.  Who am I to oppose it?

 

 

 

 

All kidding aside, Cam returns this week and we have a chance to make it through the 1st round of the playoffs as a favorite.  It seems like I have dropped acid and nothing is as it should be.

 

What witchcraft is this?

 

NXRz8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...