Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kraken no trial date, Nicole Holder another court date


ctrcat

Recommended Posts

So gearing up for the unexpected Super Bowl run without 10% of our salary cap, I curiously did a search on the public NC Court system site hoping to find some new trial info.  http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=5902014011294&court=CR  No listing of the Hardy/Holder trial, but Holder has done no new favors to her cred by having a January court date for Driving on a Revoked License and Driving with an Expired Registration.  Small beans maybe, but how much does this ***** have to do to have her cred shot to smithereens?  The entire situation on every level sends my mind into a tailspin of a tizzy.  Ridiculous.  If this is not the same Nicole Holder, my sincere apologies. 

 

 

HeadTitle.gifHeadEmpty.gif   UnselHeadDirectory.gif UnselHeadJudForms.gif UnselHeadFAQ.gif UnselHeadSearch.gif UnselHeadContact.gif     12/15/2014 Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:    2014011294 CR Arraigned Defendant Name:    HOLDER,NICOLE,DANIELLE County:    MECKLENBURG Court Date:    01/27/2015 Session:    AM Court Room:    1130

Offense Code Description Statute  4716  Traffic DWLR NOT IMPAIRED REV  20-28(A)  5461  Traffic EXPIRED REGISTRATION CARD/TAG  20-111(2)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All she has to do is update her registration and get a license, send in proof that all has been resolved, and then it will go away.  This would be inadmissible anyway.  Highly doubt the defense even tries to enter it, as it would look like Hardy is trying to parade Holder to the jury as a young, stupid girl--that could do more harm than good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client may have slammed her arm in a toilet seat and threw her by the neck across the room onto a pile or automatic weapons.  But there is something you do not know.  Something that will change the very essence of this case. 

 

Did you know that the defendant drove with a REVOKED LICENSE!!!

 

 

Objection, your honor!!

 

Withdrawn.  I have no further questions.  I rest my case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So gearing up for the unexpected Super Bowl run without 10% of our salary cap, I curiously did a search on the public NC Court system site hoping to find some new trial info.  http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/calendars.Offense.do?submit=submit&case=5902014011294&court=CR  No listing of the Hardy/Holder trial, but Holder has done no new favors to her cred by having a January court date for Driving on a Revoked License and Driving with an Expired Registration.  Small beans maybe, but how much does this ***** have to do to have her cred shot to smithereens?  The entire situation on every level sends my mind into a tailspin of a tizzy.  Ridiculous.  If this is not the same Nicole Holder, my sincere apologies. 

 

 

HeadTitle.gifHeadEmpty.gif   UnselHeadDirectory.gif UnselHeadJudForms.gif UnselHeadFAQ.gif UnselHeadSearch.gif UnselHeadContact.gif     12/15/2014 Arraigned Offenses for Case Number:    2014011294 CR Arraigned Defendant Name:    HOLDER,NICOLE,DANIELLE County:    MECKLENBURG Court Date:    01/27/2015 Session:    AM Court Room:    1130

Offense Code Description Statute  4716  Traffic DWLR NOT IMPAIRED REV  20-28(A)  5461  Traffic EXPIRED REGISTRATION CARD/TAG  20-111(2)

 

 

I pied you because you spelled "trial" correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those dismissing DWLR, many go to jail for this.  Oftentimes they do not unless there are other factors or a long history of this, but nonetheless, DWLR is an arrestable offense in and of itself.

 

I knew a guy who did a few months for Driving with a revoked license.  Of course, he had 8 of them in 5 different counties, and neglected to show up for court for about half of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One thing I didn’t consider is how thin this draft is at quarterback. That’s going to drive up the market for backups and borderline starters like Willis, Jones, and Jameis Winston. Because of that, we’ll most likely be priced out of the market for this tier of backup. 
    • We've already beat the #1 seed twice, why not one more? (Packers and Rams were both #1 seed at the time we played)
    • My determination has come down to this. Based on recent QB history, has Bryce's improvement warranted 50m per season? Lamar is the only original team QB to play on his 5th year. The others took major deals at the end of the 3rd, before or just after the option was signed. Chances are, we're getting asked for the same.  I haven't rooted for Bryce to fail. I've rooted for him to succeed so big that them signing that extension would give me no worries about our future at QB at all. We haven't seen that level of play consistently that this year. We haven't seen it in the past 6 games.  We're about to be at a threshold with Bryce and I worry about what this front office will do. We have a history of bad decision making and Morgan has been part of that group making those decisions. I don't want Carolina in the same boat Arizona and Miami are right now. It has nothing to with being right. It has to do with wanting to win for more than a single season. We've never had back to back winning seasons. Faith in their abilities is not warranted at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...