Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Couple things on the Stew fumble play.....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

" width="600" height="600" frameborder="0">

 

 

1. Bell failed to seal his block. Stew didn't have much of a chance.

 

 

2. Good lesson for Philly Brown. Philly turns his back on the play before its even over, never sees the fumble occur when he would have been in perfect position to recover.

 

The defensive coaches preach playing until the whistle. Seems like a little of that coaching needs to happen on the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Bell failed to seal his block. Stew didn't have much of a chance.

2. Good lesson for Philly Brown. Philly turns his back on the play before its even over, never sees the fumble occur when he would have been in perfect position to recover.

The defensive coaches preach playing until the whistle. Seems like a little of that coaching needs to happen on the offense.

I knew you were gonna somehow blame Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wow, come on Philly... I wonder if Ron has seen and noticed this and will do something about it.... Probably not.

 

 Ron liked the hustle he saw out there.  Said DWill wouldn't have fumbled.  He pointed out that Bell did his job and did it at a high level but both the RB and the TE failed to do the basics and really should thank Bell for being there.  His final thought on the fumble was that you just have to understand that its a process and sometimes a fumble is not a bad play.  The defense had great field position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't say Bell did not seal his block. He blocking looked consistent with an inside run so unless we know that was what was NOT called, you can't blame him.

The obvious thing is Brown. Hopefully he learns from this.

 

Think you absolutely can say that Bell didn't seal that edge, the initial defensive contact was made by his defensive end, (#86?) which meant Stewart was turned and was carrying less momentum into his original tackler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the whole blocking scheme broke down, and the fact that Philly didn't engage in a block on one of the outside guys makes me wonder if the play was a possible smoke screen out the left and DA opted for the handoff.  The play was essentially blown up by the outside defenders coming up to stuff the corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you absolutely can say that Bell didn't seal that edge, the initial defensive contact was made by his defensive end, (#86?) which meant Stewart was turned and was carrying less momentum into his original tackler.

Yes you can say that and you'll be correct but that'll be being simplistic. Try understanding what I wrote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was dwill he would be getting crucified over this. Yet stewy fumbled twice and the excuse are here. Hm......

 

It is pretty clear the problem here....

 

The saints game was a clear fluke for our running game. We still lack the right pieces. Neither running back is ideal anymore and still too many problems on the oline, rookies, bell. The play calling could also improve, but also we have DA, so the Cam threat isn't real anymore which is a rather big deal for our run game.

 

You can't say Bell did not seal his block. He blocking looked consistent with an inside run so unless we know that was what was NOT called, you can't blame him.

The obvious thing is Brown. Hopefully he learns from this.

 

What difference does it make? If Byron was worth a spill of beans he would have bulldozed that guy into next year, but when does that ever happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was dwill he would be getting crucified over this. Yet stewy fumbled twice and the excuse are here. Hm......

It is pretty clear the problem here....

The saints game was a clear fluke for our running game. We still lack the right pieces. Neither running back is ideal anymore and still too many problems on the oline, rookies, bell. The play calling could also improve, but also we have DA, so the Cam threat isn't real anymore which is a rather big deal for our run game.

What difference does it make? If Byron was worth a spill of beans he would have bulldozed that guy into next year, but when does that ever happen?

Why Bell alone? Which of the linemen are bulldozing anyone? See the guy who recovered the fumble? That was Kalil's block.

Maybe if Kalil was worth a spill of beans, he will hold his block long enough for a panther to recover the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Meh… I wish there was a network that has all sports.  This thing will fail.
    • Neither Barkley nor even a healthy CMC would move the needle much for us. Those are guys that impact teams that already have impressive overall offenses and defenses, so they can perform the complimentary roles that make them actually valuable. We should know that specifically because CMC almost never moved the needle on bad Panthers team after bad Panthers team. Ask Giants fans about that with Saquon.
    • I would generally disagree. You see a lot more load management than previously but that is because being healthy in the playoffs is such a key factor. Different philosophies in that regard than previous generations.  Baseball really doesn't matter until at least halfway through the season. I am not gonna say they don't play hard but the physical demands are infinitesimal in the MLB in comparison to basically any other major pro sport.  People dislike all the shooting these days but that's a direct correlation with how much the overall skill level of the average NBA player has drastically risen over the past 15ish years. There are other aggravating factors, certainly, but that is the biggest one in terms of playing style differences. So many of the guys from the 80's and 90's wouldn't even be able to play in the modern NBA at all. The biggest problem the NBA has with the American market(they are the only US sport that has any real international appeal or interest, minus the NHL) is that they are so steadily corrupt and fix the systems against the small market teams. Well, you eventually lose a big chunk of the league viewership/potential viewership in the process. Take the very obviously fixed NBA draft lotteries. Superstar and upper tier star players rarely want to play for small market teams, nor can they usually afford to pay them. So how do you expect them to possibly compete in that environment?
×
×
  • Create New...