Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IF we win, we will host either ARZ or SEA


Lilsmitty09

Recommended Posts

Went through all playoff simulators, and if we win the South, we will either host ARZ or SEA. There is a HUGE chance it'll be ARZ, because it would take for Seattle to lose at home to the Rams and the Cards to beat the Niners in SF with a 4th string QB.

I wouldn't mind playing either, because we have nothing to lose coming in as the "worst playoff team ever", but it would be a pretty nice game to play Arizona - a team who is struggling with no QB and has to play on the road against a team that would be getting hot at the right time (us).

 

Then again how fitting would it be for us to knock off the world champs, who the same exact team did that when they were 7-9 to a defending world champs team in our same division.

Thoughts? I REALLY believe we could beat the Cardinals. We would then have to go to either SEA or GB/DET, but you never know...Oakland almost beat SEA in SEA this year, and any given Sunday...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm, this is a Rams team that has beaten SF, Seattle, Denver, and almost beat SD on the road.

They beat Was and Oak by a combined score of 76-0 in back to back weeks.

Not to mention this was all done without Sam Bradford. 

 

Even if Seattle loses to the Rams, I still wouldn't want Seattle. Like I said, the hottest team in the NFL right now. 

 

I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why green bay/ Detroit can't tie and end up fifth. Unlikely but it can happen

Lions and Packers are both 11-4. If they tie they'd be 11-4-1 and the Lions would win the division because they won the first meeting. If either the Cardinals or Seahawks lose they would be 11-5. The Packers at 11-4-1 would get the fifth seed over the Cards or Seahawks at 11-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nice.  Allar is intriguing.  He's a medical red flag.  I'm not sure when he would be available.  However, we aren't moving off Bryce at least until '27, so he'd have time.  I'd be shocked if Young is not our starting QB next year.The OL needs some reinforcement, I agree . Moton's contract is a beast as well as the guards we signed in FA.  Corbett is hurt all the time and BC is nice depth, but a mediocre starter.  Defense is a must.  You hit some critical areas--Edge, LB, CB.  I would like to see another safety as well.
    • I don’t know how people could not see it. I am no draft scout and never claimed to be.  It is a situation where when you look at him, what does he have physically that is better than NFL average? Nothing that I could see.  Not foot speed. Not arm strength.  Then you look at his size and it is well below all but Murray in my memory for the modern NFL era.  Murray has the plus athleticism/quickness and a plus  arm. I still wouldn’t want him because of his size.   But Bryce had none of that to offset his size.  So okay now that I have assessed Bryce I don’t want him. It was a simple checklist. Except I see all this talk that they might take him. So now I decide I need to look at him closer.  Pro day video… I see what I called a skip step. A little extra move on the deep pass. I look at the velocity of his throws, NFL average is being kind. I look at that footwork and it is big time wonky.  So there you are, lower ball velocity in my opinion   That adds time in a league where guys are timed down to the 100th of a second. Not a plus. It is questionable. Then the extra move on the deep balls which is time, in the face of pressure, and space, also in the face of pressure…  it is a stack of negatives and the guy had nothing athletically to offset it. And it is the 1.1 of the NFL draft where there has  never been a successful player with his attributes at his position, in the modern era.  In his case you don’t have to be a super scout. You just had to look and think about him in relationship to the NFL game.    I never watched him in college and think that prevented me from rationalizing things. I had no bias in that regard and I believe others might have.    Combine that with a personal opinion that the SEC is not the NFL and there was no automatic approval  because of the level of competition level he faced….    On that front I feel there are single digit examples of guys who truly could be in the NFL in their final year of college. The freaks. The rest of them… take what they were their fist NFL camp and give the a season in the league and an offseason with the resources and standards of NFL conditioning and strength programs and compare them to a year before… you will see a difference. And they aren’t finished growing either so that plays into it.  It is was a bunch of factors that just equaled do not do this. It gets a lot harder if he had the size to measure up to these normal prospects with the prototypical physiques, and the cannon arm, etc. I never could claim to be good at eyeballing comparisons between two players like that.   Bryce was such a unique situation. Anyway that was the process.   Looking at guys that people compared him to was also informative, since Brees was the big one. And if you honestly look at Brees and his size, people comparing the two like they are 1 to 1, it was smoke. I am always suspicious of smoke blowing, when I find it.  Saying I was not special I just used my brain and eyes and they are not special either. So I had a very hard time understanding what people were thinking. 
×
×
  • Create New...