Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 11 vs Week 17


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

I was thinking about the changes we have made both offensively and defensively. Though I may be wrong I don't think any of our moves have made us worse.

Remmer starting at RT

Norwell starting at LG

Jonathan Stewart starting at RB

Benwikere starting at CB

Boston at FS

**not starting Philly Brown replacing Avant at WR3

These moves IMO are not coincidences. We are playing better and it is because of these guys.

We should have won with the old group against Atlanta. I think these changes will overcome the home field advantage.

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team has changed too, you know. Our O-line has played lights out since the Cleveland game and Freeman has been running possessed when he gets the chance. Our WRs have been more consistent and our run blocking is always there. Neither team is the same. This game is a toss-up imo

There's no other way to describe this game than as a "toss up".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team has changed too, you know. Our O-line has played lights out since the Cleveland game and Freeman has been running possessed when he gets the chance. Our WRs have been more consistent and our run blocking is always there. Neither team is the same. This game is a toss-up imo

One thing will also be changed.

The result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should be less succeptible to the screens this time since we play more of a press coverage than earlier. 

 

I much rather have Steven Jackson playing than Freeman.  Any one who thinks SJ is better than Freeman is related to Steven Jackson. 

 

Defending Julio isn't the key.  Pressuring Ryan with 4 is the key.  The Falcon interior has played well the last few weeks.  Ryan cannot have room to step up.

 

I feel comfortable with Luke or TD going out when Freeman goes out to WR position.   I don't feel comfortable in 3 deep coverage if we don't get pressure.

 

Cam is much faster than last time we played.  I see the Falcons having more trouble playing the read.

 

Our run game is better, their run defense is a better.  Worrilow has been playing much better as he is anticipating rather than waiting.  Makes a huge difference on net gains.  However with a read option run game we will see.

 

If we control Babineaux ..Cam will have all game to throw. All though he played well last week Osi is not a huge concern (even with Byron Bell), because you have to play disciplined pass rush with Cam.  Plus NYG Osi >>>>>>>> ATL Osi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team has changed too, you know. Our O-line has played lights out since the Cleveland game and Freeman has been running possessed when he gets the chance. Our WRs have been more consistent and our run blocking is always there. Neither team is the same. This game is a toss-up imo

Your crappy oline has not met a possessed Charles Johnson either. We are going to easily stop a mud hole in Matt Ryan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...