Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you guys want in the 1st?


MedellinHeel

Recommended Posts

Tough call, really.  But I honestly think we should take an OT in the first.  The OL has been decent these past few weeks, but it still could be better.  I would love to grab the guy from LSU, even the guy from Pittsburgh, but if either of those guys are not there, then I guess we should grab a DE or WR.

 

 

Has anyone heard the idea of cutting Johnson and resigning Hardy? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea LT or WR in the first unless there's a SS that's way better value. I'm not even down for a 1st round DE unless it's a helluva steal and someone that's legit NFL DE size. I might be convinced for an OLB if it's also a steal and someone with Von Miller type qualities (maybe Beasley if he looks to be doable as a 4-3 OLB instead of just a 3-4).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea LT or WR in the first unless there's a SS that's way better value. I'm not even down for a 1st round DE unless it's a helluva steal and someone that's legit NFL DE size. I might be convinced for an OLB if it's also a steal and someone with Von Miller type qualities (maybe Beasley if he looks to be doable as a 4-3 OLB instead of just a 3-4).

 

Not convinced of this? Dude is a FREAK. Massive upside as an OLB. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea LT or WR in the first unless there's a SS that's way better value. I'm not even down for a 1st round DE unless it's a helluva steal and someone that's legit NFL DE size. I might be convinced for an OLB if it's also a steal and someone with Von Miller type qualities (maybe Beasley if he looks to be doable as a 4-3 OLB instead of just a 3-4).

FINALLY!!! Yes I totally agree with your stance on Vic Beasley! Imagine him and Luke Kuechly tackling sideline-to-sideline. Imagine a 100% Jon Beason, yes Beasley Is A Beast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not convinced of this? Dude is a FREAK. Massive upside as an OLB. 

 

 

Uh, 80% of that video was fumble recoveries and rushing the ball.  I'll do more research, anybody named Shaq already has his foot in the door with me :)  But there wasn't really anything impressive in that video.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 25, I would not expect an immediate starter.

 

Possible that one of the WR prospects fall that far.  Will be like last season on the OT's I am afraid.  They were way overdrafted anyway and I doubt Gman picks an OT at 25 that is rated a 3rd rounder.

 

Philly Brown, Tre Boston, Norwell, Turner, Norman, Bene, have all given us less NEED so I expect us to go BPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoping for players to fall at this point . Jalen Strong would be nice. I believe OT Cedric O will be there.

Wouldn't mind Beasley or a impact OLB. That could be bpa

I haven't been on the fence about a prospect as much as I am with Strong since Kenny Vaccaro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The panthers offense right now is spiritually the same as the 2010s Seahawks. They want to keep it close until the fourth quarter and then try to pull a rabbit out of their hat. instead of running marshawn into the line 30 times a game, we’re throwing 20 passes behind the line of scrimmage. And instead of Russell Wilson bullshit, we’re getting 20 yard drives to set up a 55 yard field goal. Also that team had multiple hall of famers and we’ve got the worst qb in the league by whatever collections of metrics you want to use
    • So if Bryce could have come to Carolina with the same advantages he had every year at Alabama he would have been successful. Good coaches. Top recruiting classes far better than the opposition. Defense able to bail him out if he has a bad game.  Still doesnt change anything regarding footwork, mechanics, drop backs, reading the field, poor placement or any of the other myriad of issues that are still present in year 3.  Bryce wasn't ready to be the day 1 starter. There's nothing wrong with that. Dalton was clearly the more capable QB, as evidenced by what happened in Seattle in the rain, under extreme pressure. Same players, same coach, same terrible offensive line. Two different offenses.  When you look at Bryce and what he's done in game over the course of 3 years it's not pretty. He has moments of good, but there's been a lot more WTF. But saying Bryce would have been able to lead a team to the playoffs? Based on what we saw from him, he probably would have spent a good bit of year one on the bench holding a clipboard. 
    • Feels on brand for Mike Brown.  He's very anti trade.
×
×
  • Create New...