Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Since December 1 2014....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Here are some averages to compare for the month of December, 4 games each.

 

 

Offense

 

Points

Panthers: 28

Seahawks: 24

 

Average Yards

Panthers: 399

Seahawks: 420

 

 

Rushing Yards

Panthers: 199

Seahawks: 185

 

 

 

Defense

 

 

 

Points Allowed

Panthers: 11

Seahawks: 8

 

 

1st Downs Allowed

Panthers: 14

Seahawks: 14

 

Yards Allowed

Panthers: 278

Seahawks: 211

 

Pass Yards Allowed

Panthers: 181

Seahawks: 144

 

Rushing Yards Allowed

Panthers: 98

Seahawks: 67

 

Forced turnovers

Panthers: 2.25

Seahawks: 1.5

 

 

 

 

Average Opponent Overall Offensive Ranking

 

Panthers 16

Seahawks 19

 

(Carolina's defense had the tougher challenge in December)

 

 

 

Conclusion: This is going to be a very tight game, as most have said. The difference? Running the ball and turnovers. Panthers are better right now at both of these things. If Stewart can rack up 100+ yards and the Panthers win the turnover differential, the game is probably won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should ban you

 

My wife says the same thing.

In their last 6 games, the Seahawks have surrendered a total of 39 points.  However, I cannot say that any of those teams has a great running attack. In addition, All seemed rather one-dimensional at the time.  Philly became one dimensional (Sanchez), as did SF (2 games with Kaepernick, lame duck coach) and Arizona.  The Rams play the Seahawks tough every year, with a backup QB and suspect running attack. 

 

I think that is going to be the key.  If we can balance the run/pass effectiveness, we can beat the Seahawks.   Not cover the spread, not get lucky--beat them.

 

I cannot see how they would not be overconfident heading into this week.  They have beaten us at our place, we had a 7-8-1 record, and we lost Star.  They have to know that a third of our starters are rookies.  They are at home.   The stage is set for a beat down, and I think this Panther team is capable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is where seahawk fan says our last 6 games were against DII women's basketball teams

 

But look at their schedule:  RAMS (who is qb there?  RB?)  NINERS TWICE (Kaepernick sucks, Harbaugh was out),  ARIZONA (QB unknown), EAGLES (Sanchez and overall fatigue from playing Kellyball all season),  etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Apparently CSW lost his starting job to Thornton last year. If he can stay healthy I bet Thornton keeps that NB position. 
    • I member him staying after practices with only to see he was wearing heavy weight vest, one of his trademarks. He also put in 10 years, right? People forget he was the ST stud that called the snap and made sure everyone lined up right. He was one of the "glue" guys that bought his "lunch pail" to work.... He was a willing solider, all teams need a couple of them. He blocked for sooo many panthers RBs- Davis, lane, Williams, foster, goings and when there was huge injuries he took over the starter duties and had a couple 100 yard games. If you followed hoover, he took the perfect RB path cause he was just a slow heavy one himself....
    • Walker likely depends on a couple of things. What exactly did Dan promise him, to start with.  How much other interest he actually had for a starter job at high pay is another question. It isn’t outside the realm of possibility that he could stay on as a swing tackle waiting to take Moton’s spot when it opens.    I can’t get myself to consider Icky as a viable anything until we see him back on the field.     Hunt seems to be a team player and good guy but I don’t think he is worth what he is being paid. I have him tentatively earmarked for cap causality in the near future.     
×
×
  • Create New...