Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam or Russell - which would you take as your franchise QB


Cary Kollins

Cam or Russell  

127 members have voted

  1. 1. Which player would you want as your franchise QB?

    • Cam Newton
      108
    • Russell Wilson
      19


Recommended Posts

There will be NO BIAS HERE!  =)

 

As a Panther fan, I take Cam.  He's got more talent, and the right coaching staff over his career would maximize his talents.  Is he in that situation now?  I don't know.  We all have our problems with our Coaching staff.  It's often fun to go "if only we had X coach..." to play that greener grass game.  How would Cam do if Mike McCarthy was our HC/Offensive Guru?  Would he be Arron Rodgers like while running rampant across the NFL?  Who knows!?

 

Wilson has shown since day 1 he is a legit NFL starting QB.  He's smart with the ball, has an incredible knack for avoiding pass rushers to extend plays, and has a great winning percentage.  How much of his success do you place on Team versus individual attributes?  I don't imagine Seattle fans or coaches would be willing to part with Wilson right now!

 

So random epiphany:  Wilson is a plug and play guy.  He'd have success in nearly any NFL system.  Cam is a build your team guy.  You can build your system around Cam, but he won't fit into every offensive system easily.  Am I wrong?  There is a good chance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-2050-0-97190900-1420811581_thumb.jp

 

Russell would actually be pretty solid in our system.

 

He has pretty terrible pocket awareness and even tends to feel something that I saw coined "phantom pressure". With how bad our offensive line is, I believe that he'd do a pretty solid job due to his scrambling nature. However, Cam's my guy.

 

Russell is the type of player that once a blue print is drawn up, he will begin to struggle.

 

I said the following a different thread.

 

The real key to stopping him is having the corner's play off the wide receivers (Wilson is deadly in play action), play a zone scheme on the back end (Wilson struggles against the zone) use a spy on Wilson (this keeps him from taking off if there's nothing available), getting pressure up the middle, and playing contain on the ends (keep him in the pocket).

 

Look at the particular play that I attached.

 

- Corners off

- Zone Coverage

- Kuechly spying and picking up the leaker

- Contain on the outside

- Rush up the inside

 

I believe Wilson scrambled for a one yard gain there.

post-2050-0-97190900-1420811581_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love RW for his/my time at State, he's a nice dude and obviously a great football player.

 

 

But give me Cam. He's had one of the most historic openings to a career ever...and still can improve immensely. The sky is the limit for him potential wise, he hasn't been given the best weapons or OL yet, he's battled injuries and incompetent coaching, and from a marketability stand point I don't think there's anyone better in the NFL than Cam. If I'm picking a face of the franchise from a business and football standpoint, Cam in a landslide. If I'm picking based solely on talent, Cam still has the edge for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...