Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RR: OC Shula did a good job at end of the season


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Shula's philosophy has always evolved around ball control, make no mistakes, pick up 4-5 yards per play, etc.

That is not a successful game plan in today's NFL. Why are we the only ones who see this!!!

I don't know. Seattle, Baltimore, and Giants have similar approach and they have had postseason success.

It is about being effecient. That is all that truly matters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know. Seattle, Baltimore, and Giants have similar approach and they have had postseason success.

It is about being effecient. That is all that truly matters

 

In Baltimore, Kubiak runs a successful stretch-zone run scheme.  Yes, it is designed to run, to set up the pass.  But the philosophy is eventually get large chunk yardage.  

 

In Seattle, Bevelle fluctuates between working off the play-action to capitalize large gains and a traditional West-Coast offense.  

Ben McAdoo in New York runs a hybrid west coast scheme and vertical attacking offense. which has not proven very effective.

 

How would you describe Shula?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running the ball effectively does wonders.

 

Here's a scenario I'd throw out there for everyone:  a few inches.

 

Think about this, the NFL is a game of inches, and a lot of times guys were inches from making plays.  Say next year we get those inches.  We get those drops back.  Instead of barely scoring, we are back to being really efficient and scoring well.  With fewer drops, Cam's completion percentage goes north of 60%.  We are still able to run for over 150 yards per game and control the ball.  We continue to work on our 2 minute / No Huddle Offense.

 

Let's say we make the plays we "just' missed this year, and 2015 is more successful (Super Bowl?!?).

 

Does that change your opinion of Shula-Ball?  Or is it like any other system, dependent upon the execution?

 

I will probably get lambasted again for making an unpopular point.  I do think that Shula needs to go in order to get the most out of our players.  I'd love to see us actually attack a defense's weaknesses better and have some plays which allow guys to get open (like what we seem to see weekly...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Baltimore, Kubiak runs a successful stretch-zone run scheme.  Yes, it is designed to run, to set up the pass.  But the philosophy is eventually get large chunk yardage.  

 

In Seattle, Bevelle fluctuates between working off the play-action to capitalize large gains and a traditional West-Coast offense.  

Ben McAdoo in New York runs a hybrid west coast scheme and vertical attacking offense. which has not proven very effective.

 

How would you describe Shula?  

 

To be honest our identity is pretty simple. We're an E-P offence with read option and more recently no huddle when required. At times we've actually run it quite successfully using long drives that eat the clock and cover fair distance very well.

 

The problem has simply been execution in the pass game and lack of creativity in the red zone. The execution looks a lot worse compared to all the high percentage passing WC offences that exist nowadays and especially this season with our WR lack of separation and Cam's accuracy issues (linked to injury and O line). You take a young offence with no chemistry and expect them to execute E-P, you get issues with timing and drops, exactly what we've seen this season. 

 

Accuracy, Speed and chemistry are the two things that we've lacked to execute the E-P more succesfully this season, If we address these with the O-Line and WRs with a full off-season for Cam I truly think this offence can be brutal next season. 

 

The only thing we can really get on Shula's back for is the Redzone problems, where play creativity comes in. Hopefully he works on red zone offence this off-season as "pass to score, run to win" doesn't really work if you cant pass in the endzone. 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_England_Patriots_strategy - Read to understand more on E-P and its benefits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really.

Against the Saints he did well, but so did everyone against that defense.

The other games were below average.

It was all personnel didn't you get the memo? Shula did great with the crappy personnel he was given right? Our ST was also all personnel. These couches are amazing. It's not like Ron knows them, their families and is lying to himself so he doesn't have to hurt a friends feelings.

I wonder what Ron's excuse will be after we have the personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe anybody would be surprised.

 

It takes mediocre to know mediocre.

 

The better teams to best teams in this league evolve.  Not the Panthers, let's just keep doing what we are doing becaues isn't everyone's desire a 7-9 record?  ...and we will throw in a few meaningless wins in December, you know, just to make sure its obtainable, that 7-9 record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...