Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

50 Shades of Gray was the worst movie I've ever seen. (No spoilers)


TNPanther

Recommended Posts

is there anyone ethically opposed to this thing btw? i've heard tons of boycotts because the main character is obsessive and a little rapey, but idk if i can trust the sources because they're invariably evangelicals whose opinions are tainted by the fact that they think god is gonna step on a kitten every time you have sex outside of marriage anyway

I'm just not a fan of their actions. BDSM can be messed up stuff and can lead to violence in every day activities. That's my big grievance. I just don't want to support that.

And that's not a knock on anyone that may enjoy that stuff, but it's just too hardcore for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just not a fan of their actions. BDSM can be messed up stuff and can lead to violence in every day activities. That's my big grievance. I just don't want to support that.

And that's not a knock on anyone that may enjoy that stuff, but it's just too hardcore for me.

 

i haven't seen the movie or read the books, but a number of people have brought up the seemingly good point that if the dude was a fatass 40 year old car salesman everyone would want his creepy molesty ass in jail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is there anyone ethically opposed to this thing btw? i've heard tons of boycotts because the main character is obsessive and a little rapey, but idk if i can trust the sources because they're invariably evangelicals whose opinions are tainted by the fact that they think god is gonna step on a kitten every time you have sex outside of marriage anyway

I've been wondering how many women who sprinted to theaters would flip out if they caught their man watching porn. Obvious surface differences aside, aren't the two serving the same basic purpose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is there anyone ethically opposed to this thing btw? i've heard tons of boycotts because the main character is obsessive and a little rapey, but idk if i can trust the sources because they're invariably evangelicals whose opinions are tainted by the fact that they think god is gonna step on a kitten every time you have sex outside of marriage anyway

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21643170-strange-popularity-fifty-shades-grey-south-all-tied-up-bible-belt?fsrc=scn/tw/te/pe/ed/alltiedupinthebiblebelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is there anyone ethically opposed to this thing btw? i've heard tons of boycotts because the main character is obsessive and a little rapey, but idk if i can trust the sources because they're invariably evangelicals whose opinions are tainted by the fact that they think god is gonna step on a kitten every time you have sex outside of marriage anyway

 

 

This movie and book seem to support the idea (mostly judges...) that women like to be raped or at least the fantasy of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know about rapey... A big part of the movie was her not yet signing the Consent Contract. It wasnt a secret what he wanted to do, full disclosure, safe words & all... Hell, the contract negotiations were kind of amusing... 

 

"Remove anal fisting, please.."

"Done.."

"Regular fisting too, for that matter.."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know about rapey... A big part of the movie was her not yet signing the Consent Contract. It wasnt a secret what he wanted to do, full disclosure, safe words & all... Hell, the contract negotiations were kind of amusing... 

 

"Remove anal fisting, please.."

"Done.."

"Regular fisting too, for that matter.."

 

 

Well fug, I'm definitely not watching it if there's no anal fisting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...