Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Hardy situation scare panthers away from Green-Beckham?

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

I guess that grace, mercy, sacrifice and redemption are unknown concepts to many in regards to the first round.

Moreover, it's kind of hypocritical---if not just simpleminded in a way---to say that this guy is not good enough morally to be drafted in the first round, but is good enough morally to be drafted in the second or third, etc. Oh, what? It's all about money? Well, then say "It's all about money!"

If we were good people, we'd trade Cleveland a first rounder for Josh Gordon so we could give him a shot at redemption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

I guess that grace, mercy, sacrifice and redemption are unknown concepts to many in regards to the first round.

Moreover, it's kind of hypocritical---if not just simpleminded in a way---to say that this guy is not good enough morally to be drafted in the first round, but is good enough morally to be drafted in the second or third, etc. Oh, what? It's all about money? Well, then say "It's all about money!"

 

It has nothing to with morals.

 

Far be it from me to criticize anyone about their "morals" with the skeletons in my closet.

 

My issue is potential risk TO THE TEAM.  An NFL team is not a halfway house for people with substance issues and/or domestic abuse issues to come rehabilitate themselves.   Its a goddam BUSINESS.

 

And BUSINESSES make choices about the quality of the people they hire and choose to pay good money to do a job.  If they deem the investment in that person is too risky, they won't do it.

 

Morals?  Nah.  GTFO with that strawman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

It has nothing to with morals.

 

Far be it from me to criticize anyone about their "morals" with the skeletons in my closet.

 

My issue is potential risk TO THE TEAM.  An NFL team is not a halfway house for people with substance issues and/or domestic abuse issues to come rehabilitate themselves.   Its a goddam BUSINESS.

 

And BUSINESSES make choices about the quality of the people they hire and choose to pay good money to do a job.  If they deem the investment in that person is too risky, they won't do it.

 

Morals?  Nah.  GTFO with that strawman.

 

 

It's a useful tool for pointing out when an argument is silly.

Our resident Auburn fan nailed it pretty well.

 

 

So, that's why Jerry Richardson took Moss off the draft board, because the risk to the team was too big. Oh, I got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

I am sure that Jerry Richardson was crying---what was really in reference to how he was handling Hardy--because of Hardy's risk to the team as well. That's why he succumbed to the will of the Shield also.  

 

Gimme a break!

 

The CBA was rewritten to mitigate the risk of high round draft picks, so all this risk to the team is largely overblown.  That and the fact that they can just get rid of a player if he does too badly.  The fact is that Cleveland, Jacksonville, and whoever else can get rid of their problem children without much risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

With the NFL trying so hard to maintain their BS corporate image, it's extremely risky proposition to draft anyone with potential off the field issues. Green-Beckham is a second rounder at best for that reason.

That being said, any owner action in the draft room is bad.

/Queue the "But he gave me muh franchise!" apologists.

Yeah, he's a second rounder at best. Especially since most Mocks have him being drafted in the first round. We do not need to pass on this kid if he's available in the first round at 25.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • trucpfan
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By trucpfan · Posted

      You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Cpt slay a ho
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Cpt slay a ho · Posted

      Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • Thorrez
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Thorrez · Posted

      This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...