Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers met with Miami OT Ereck Flowers


DaCityKats

Recommended Posts

Editor of BoltBeat.com Bolt Beat @ BB_Chargers 9h

Not a lot of love for Ereck Flowers out at tackle right now at the combine

Ty Schalter @tyschalter 9h

I'm writing right now and watching Combine in the

background, but I don't see Ereck Flowers showing a lot of

fluidity.

Draft Scout 24/7 @DraftScout247 23h

Really like what I see watching OT Ereck Flowers on film. Massive frame, long arms, quick feet, and keeps his legs moving through contact

thepointofpittsburgh.com Connor Isted @ cdisted 9h

Ereck Flowers looks good so far, especially taking his youth into account. Best natural RT in the draft.

cincyjungle.com Brennen Warner @ JustBeWarned Feb 19

Ereck Flowers fits the Bengals mold for right tackles. Huge.

Better run blocker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AllGreenBayPackers.com Jersey Al - ALLGBP @ JerseyAlGBP 36m

Didn't get the amount of love Ereck Flowers was getting pre-

combine and he looked pretty poor in the slide step drill. He's

a guard.

Steelersdepot.com Alex Kozora @Alex_Kozora 7h

Miami's Ereck Flowers downright ugly in kickslide drill.

Incredibly overextended, not on 45 degree angle. Beat bad.

South Florida Sun-Sentinel Omar Kelly @ OmarKelly 12h

Ereck Flowers is today's new Orlando Franklin. Decent at OT,

good at OG IMO. Stiff .

turnonthejets.com Big Bob @thewordofbob31 10m

Ereck Flowers didn't look smooth at all in the drills.

hogshaven.com Paul Conner @ P_Hazard 13h

Looks like my worry about Flowers' kickstep is validated

NFLMocks.com Joe Wedra @ JoeWedra 12h

I may have to re-evaluate Ereck Flowers ' tape after seeing

him today . Not a good performance.

Wade Keyte III @WadeKeyte 12h

Ereck Flowers losing money today

BigBoardDraft.com Seth Murphy @ Sethmurphy4991 Feb 15

Ereck Flowers 1st round hype: I don't get it. I see a Guard .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Todd McShay's thoughts after watching the combine:

Ereck Flowers , OT, Miami (FL): He's a massive right tackle prospect at 6-6, 329 pounds, with long arms (34.5 inches) and excellent strength -- his 37 bench press reps were the most in his class, which is pretty remarkable given how long his arms are. His times weren't great, with a 5.31 40, but not bad when you consider his size. He didn't do the jumps or shuttles, so he'll need to do those at his pro day.

Team fits: Same as Clemmings: Rams (#10), Browns (#12 and #19), Saints (#13), Texans (#16), Lions (#23), Panthers (#25).

(for Clemmings, who he called a "right tackle prospect whose game is built on power in the run game, and who needs work in pass protection," his team fits were: "Any team looking for a right tackle drafting in the 10-25 range. The Rams at No. 10 is probably a little early, but they could be in the mix. The Browns (#12 and #19), Saints (#13), Texans (#16), Lions (#23) and Panthers (#25) also make sense in the first round.")

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/mcshay-best-team-fits-for-top-o-linemen.315726/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Todd McShay's thoughts after watching the combine:

Ereck Flowers , OT, Miami (FL): He's a massive right tackle prospect at 6-6, 329 pounds, with long arms (34.5 inches) and excellent strength -- his 37 bench press reps were the most in his class, which is pretty remarkable given how long his arms are. His times weren't great, with a 5.31 40, but not bad when you consider his size. He didn't do the jumps or shuttles, so he'll need to do those at his pro day.

Team fits: Same as Clemmings: Rams (#10), Browns (#12 and #19), Saints (#13), Texans (#16), Lions (#23), Panthers (#25).

(for Clemmings, who he called a "right tackle prospect whose game is built on power in the run game, and who needs work in pass protection," his team fits were: "Any team looking for a right tackle drafting in the 10-25 range. The Rams at No. 10 is probably a little early, but they could be in the mix. The Browns (#12 and #19), Saints (#13), Texans (#16), Lions (#23) and Panthers (#25) also make sense in the first round.")

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/mcshay-best-team-fits-for-top-o-linemen.315726/

 

Jake Fisher is the only prototype LT in the draft IMO.  I think he's going to go a lot higher than people think.  I'd love to have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...