Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton should be paid more than Luck or Wilson


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Cam Newton should be paid more than Luck or Wilson. 

 

If you ask yourself what percentage of the overall offensive success is each QB responsible for, Cam Newton comes out well above Andrew Luck or Russell Wilson. Cam Newton and his legs are the main reason the Panthers offense had any success at all last season. If not for his ability to stay alive with his physical talents when linemen and linebackers are chasing him, the Panthers would have been ranked dead last in the league. 

 

In other words, Cam Newton is a huge band-aid holding together an inept offense. Partly due to lack of weapons, partly due to a below average coordinator, the Panthers offense was more of a hindrance than a help in the playoff race. Whatever the reasons for the bad offense, Cam Newton made sure it was at least competitive. 

 

I'm not saying Cam Newton will get more money. I'm not saying the Panthers will pay more money. 

 

I'm saying if you look at the situation objectively, Cam and his agent have a serious argument for more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on the notion that Cam is more valuable and integral to our offense than Wilson from a casual glance. I have a hard time saying he is more important than Luck is to the Colts.

 

 

Which team would see more of a drop in offensive performance if they had to start a decent journeyman QB? 

 

The Colts would drop a bit, but not nearly as much as the Panthers would. I'm not sure a journeyman QB would even survive three games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers were 2-0 with a second string QB fueled by conserveative play calls and strong defense.

Doubt INDY could pull a greasy string out of a cats rear without Luck. Seattle would still compete based on their stellar D

The Panthers barely squeaked by the team who has the #1 pick in the draft. Let's not get carried away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which team would see more of a drop in offensive performance if they had to start a decent journeyman QB?

The Colts would drop a bit, but not nearly as much as the Panthers would. I'm not sure a journeyman QB would even survive three games.

.

Both are critical to their teams offensive production. What sets Cam a little bit apart is what he does with his legs on the running game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The test for me, for fans is this:

 

Would you be happy or pissed if Newton signed with the Panthers for $17 million per year?

 

Most here would be ticked off and complain becuase they think he deserves more.  Same for Keek coming up, some peoples fandom of players gets in the way of their "big picture" team view in my opinion.

 

Go back just a few years to all the "Double Trouble ain't goin nowhere" discussions.  How'd that work out for us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What percentage of the salary cap are you willing to devote to just two of 63+ players (Cam and Luke)?

If we're going to go back to having massive cap devoted to just a few guys and having to skimp on the rest of the roster, what was the point of firing Marty Hurney?

Its not how much but where that money is tied up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DA won two games for us last year. Just saying. Cam went went 6-9-1 with the same offense. Cam is a very important piece to the offense and makes us better but he's not the end all be all. In no way should he get more than Luck. 18-19 a year and most of it guaranteed. Keep the cap hits low and spread out the guaranteed $$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In Philly it's called passion when the fans launch beer bottles and boo their team off the field on their way to a Superbowl. Here, it's fair-weather if you are ever dissatisfied. Two things can be true at once. Bryce has been underwhelming at an epic level if you look at the full scope of his career, and he also played lights out today. I'm excited to what they can bring to MNF vs the 49ers because that's going to be a BIG test for this team.
    • If you want to ride or die with Bryce after one anomaly game good for you. His body of work is bad. Even bad QBs can have really good games. A backup QB we have on our roaster, White, threw for 400 yards as well and he is a practice squad player now.  Being a fan means you have every right to criticize the team you follow. Bryce played well today. But he has played well before and followed it up with continued crap play afterward.  We’ll see if he can have some consistency with the Niners. But one gold games doesn’t erase the fact is it week 11 and the other weeks he looked like crap.  No reason to keep a player on our roaster who will never be consistent and always started out the year playing like poo. 
    • And that falls right in line with the several times he has chucked it away or grounded it on 4th downs in the past.  But, I guess that is Zavala’s fault too. The amount of passes he gets for inexcusable poo has been ridiculous.  Again, I have and will give him props when he has played well.  The most frustrating thing among many about him since he’s been here is him being so risk-averse that he refuses to give guys legitimate chances to make a play, even when that should be the only option (like 4th downs).  And yet, he creates mistakes that shouldn’t be possible on the most basic, conservative, run-of-the-mill plays -i.e., the interception to the sideline last week against NO, the Jessie Bates interception fest, the numerous fumbles on basic tackles or without even contact, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...