Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Courtside or luxury box seats?


Donald LaFell

Recommended Posts

Has anybody ever done this? I'm kind curious about doing it as a one time thing just for the bucket list experience. I don't know the prices or if it's worth it etc.

I'm sure it's way cheaper than trying it with the Lakers lol.

Never done luxury suites but I've sat behind the scorers table before at a Hornets game and it's fun. You get to go back to the locker room area and get free food and what not, the view is amazing, and the player chatter is hilarious.

When I went we ate at the front court club (same level as the suites) because they had chefs preparing 5* meals before the game then we got snacks (beer, popcorn, etc...) at the back court club.

Overall it's an awesome experience and if you like to be in the action it's a fun thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy and I went to a Bobcats game vs Celtics one year (we got TRASHED by Celtics) but before the game we were in the nosebleeds with our gear on and some lady came up and asked if we wanted to get comped and sit courtside.  Didn't believe it at first but she took us down there and it was right at half court, first row, in the seats.  We also had all access to the bar thing right there as well.   It was a cool experience being that close to the players and listening to Garnett complain the entire game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I much prefer sitting down close to the court.

The closest I've been was last season, about 7 rows behind the Knicks bench.

Being able to hear the players on the court and to really see how big they are was amazing. Also seeing the disfunction between Amare and Mike Woodson was hilarious. During timeouts, Amare would just space out and look around at the crowd. I gave him a shoulder shrug one time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only done this with football games. I sat on the first row of the 40 yard line behind Panthers bench for 2003 playoff game against Cowboys. And I've also done the luxury box thing a few times.

 

Face value of first row seats were about $120 in 2003 but being playoffs and everything I'm sure they were worth  more (as I went with season ticket holder.) To get in a luxury box you either have to be a huge businessperson in charlotte and be able to lease it out for the year or you have to be invited by a bigwig who already has a box. The box experience is more expensive and many would prefer it.

 

I prefer being right by the action and the real fans. Boxes are like lame cocktail parties while a football game plays on TV. Free beer and food though if you're not the one paying for the box though so thats cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people who sat courtside.. but who can give info about the booth?

 

 

Yeah boxes are cool if you can get hooked up with a coporate sponser and don't have to pay anything.

 

 

I think they can be a good deal if you have a big group, like 15-20 people, but otherwise I think it's too expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Calling carrier for getting punched in the nose just to keep us from a 5 on 3
    • I just mean it’s always offsetting in that situation.  I didn’t realize they called another penalty
    • And as I asked this again before, what goes into PFF's man open %, as I know you've brought that stat up before. Is that just the number of routes he gets open at any point during the route, or is it calculated on targets and if he was open when the ball got to him. Because like I pointed out so many times in the lead up to the draft, a big reason it was harder for him to get separation against man was because he not only had his man on him, but he was double or triple teamed on the majority of his routes this past year.  Just because of that alone, it was easier for him to get open against zone coverage where he could find holes and sit in them. Also, again, as been discussed so many times, his QB's play this year was awful, and lots of times his contested catches were due to him not delivering the ball on time when T-Mac got open.  Or just times he got open but wasn't targeted for whatever reason. So just using that stat as a way to say he struggles to get open against man is more likely than not, disingenuous. Hell, it's a PFF stat that you're using against him, yet at the same time, PFF absolutely loves him, he was their 4th overall player.   I posted this clip on here a week or so ago of the T-Mac vs Hunter game in 2023, where the anti T-Mac guys like to say Hunter shut him down.  But numerous times in this video you see T-Mac create tons of separation from Hunter but the ball wasn't thrown his way, plus a clear PI that wasn't called (and the one that was). https://x.com/4MR_Fetti/status/1918262063660454227 The "he can't separate" narrative is way overblown and become something more myth than reality.  No, he's not an elite separator like some of the quick twitch WRs, but he's so much better than the haters here like to say.
×
×
  • Create New...