Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen always trying to get an edge


sml1950

Recommended Posts

I worked in a lab that did cryogenic preservation and we had 'hot tubs' at -180 C. It's cold, but cold, dry, still air of the vapor phase isn't all that bad for short periods of time (think of an igloo being 60 degrees) as long as you're not in contact with a surface that cold and/or wet and as long as there is air circulation (lid is open). It's actually rather refreshing, and I preferred it to working in the ice water or directly handling the stuff kept in the -80 freezers.

That said, you absolutely do not want bare skin to come into direct contact with the liquid nitrogen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worked in a lab that did cryogenic preservation and we had 'hot tubs' at -180 C. It's cold, but cold, dry, still air of the vapor phase isn't all that bad for short periods of time (think of an igloo being 60 degrees) as long as you're not in contact with a surface that cold and/or wet and as long as there is air circulation (lid is open). It's actually rather refreshing, and I preferred it to working in the ice water or directly handling the stuff kept in the -80 freezers.

That said, you absolutely do not want bare skin to come into direct contact with the liquid nitrogen.

 

 

We literally have someone on the huddle for any question. Drs, lawyers, scientists,porn stars, you name it we got it. Zod should assemble his own A team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worked in a lab that did cryogenic preservation and we had 'hot tubs' at -180 C. It's cold, but cold, dry, still air of the vapor phase isn't all that bad for short periods of time (think of an igloo being 60 degrees) as long as you're not in contact with a surface that cold and/or wet and as long as there is air circulation (lid is open). It's actually rather refreshing, and I preferred it to working in the ice water or directly handling the stuff kept in the -80 freezers.

That said, you absolutely do not want bare skin to come into direct contact with the liquid nitrogen.

 

On the contrary ... it is fine for liquid nitrogen to contact the skin due to its very low specific heat.  You don't want it 'ponding' on any part of your body or that will be trouble.  Otherwise, it makes for a 'cool' show. 

 

A cheap version of the cryogenics therapy that Olsen is doing ... is a frigid immersion pool.  However, that's the common man 's therapy where cost actually matters.

 

Just saying ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the contrary ... it is fine for liquid nitrogen to contact the skin due to its very low specific heat. You don't want it 'ponding' on any part of your body or that will be trouble. Otherwise, it makes for a 'cool' show.

A cheap version of the cryogenics therapy that Olsen is doing ... is a frigid immersion pool. However, that's the common man 's therapy where cost actually matters.

Just saying ...

$255 a month for unlimited uses here. I looked into it and decided on just cold showers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the contrary ... it is fine for liquid nitrogen to contact the skin due to its very low specific heat. You don't want it 'ponding' on any part of your body or that will be trouble. Otherwise, it makes for a 'cool' show.

A cheap version of the cryogenics therapy that Olsen is doing ... is a frigid immersion pool. However, that's the common man 's therapy where cost actually matters.

Just saying ...

Right, but for the average person that's not common knowledge. Best to just avoid it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're saying the same thing as I said.  Until Jordan becomes an active part of recruiting and funding, this school will continue to fall way behind.  But to say Michael Jordan or the Jordan brand doesn't matter anymore, which is what you said, is flat out wrong.  
    • I have not learnt my lesson and will always want Uber athletic profiles. Sorry, Im a whore about it.... Im not the right guy to defend Kenyon, I just have a understanding with this years draft, numbers, and panthers roster. He is more of "upside/project" and we are talking 19th pick here too.  I know about the years of all the mock drafts with TEs in them and I did want Pitts too.... Look I love the current TEs on the roster too, just this guy should be better than any of them at their best.  Right now I feel OT is the correct target, but panthers as a org are trying to win in 2026 than 2027. So tea leaves and all, Kenyon would help this year. You can even say flex him to slot for most of the snaps and think of tmac on smoke routes with Kenyon blocking for him. I just hate BY is the shooter..... warren, I would say he's the better prospect even without his rookie year, *but he was late bloomer like XL if Im right, plus age was 25ish?? Bears picked love above him, mainly cause of recs.  You can make a case that Kenyon is not a TE, but a moving weapon for offense that can be in the backfield, on the LOS, slot, and even X.... imean he's got XLs combine on some numbers.... He would be better to a offense mad scientist type...is that Dave? or is that bevell?? I think the Panthers should have him as a 19 pick, with others... 
    • That's one of the best power play games I've seen us have in a while.
×
×
  • Create New...