Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has James Anderson Turned the Corner?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

I feel like a lot of guys are completely ignoring his performance this preseason. The guy might have made a play here or there throughout his time here... even had a sack or two in the regular season that one game against New Orleans (his rookie year I think).

But, just from watching the games this year, the guy is tearing it up. We all had pretty much wrote him off as a cut this year, but he definitely has proven his worth this preseason. Every game he's made some big plays. Blocked punts, sack and leading the team in tackles.

I know Leman and Connor are everyone's favorites (I'm a Leman guy myself), but Anderson has really impressed me this year. Maybe all it took was to know that his livelihood was on the line this year and he went into beast mode. I'd like to see what he could do as a starter with Beason and Davis now. What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like a lot of guys are completely ignoring his performance this preseason. The guy might have made a play here or there throughout his time here... even had a sack or two in the regular season that one game against New Orleans (his rookie year I think).

But, just from watching the games this year, the guy is tearing it up. We all had pretty much wrote him off as a cut this year, but he definitely has proven his worth this preseason. Every game he's made some big plays. Blocked punts, sack and leading the team in tackles.

I know Leman and Connor are everyone's favorites (I'm a Leman guy myself), but Anderson has really impressed me this year. Maybe all it took was to know that his livelihood was on the line this year and he went into beast mode. I'd like to see what he could do as a starter with Beason and Davis now. What say you?

i don't think that he is being ignored. gantt seems to think that he is getting too much attention.

i think the fact that he is leading the league in preseason tackles is too hard to ignore plus the other things that he has done.

he is an opportunist which i don't see as a bad thing. he isn't the best but he sure knows how to sit back and look for opportunities and exploit them.

the unfortunate thing for us is that we have landon johnson on the roster with a huge contract that is going to force us to cut one of connor, anderson, and leman or go with 7 LBs. i really don't see connor as getting cut and going through the season with 7 linebackers isn't very realistic.

i would love it if johnson could get traded but i think he would have to have some PT before anyone would want him and that isn't something he has had much of.

now either anderson or leman could wind up on the practice squad but i don't see them lasting there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think that he is being ignored. gantt seems to think that he is getting too much attention.

i think the fact that he is leading the league in preseason tackles is too hard to ignore plus the other things that he has done.

he is an opportunist which i don't see as a bad thing. he isn't the best but he sure knows how to sit back and look for opportunities and exploit them.

the unfortunate thing for us is that we have landon johnson on the roster with a huge contract that is going to force us to cut one of connor, anderson, and leman or go with 7 LBs. i really don't see connor as getting cut and going through the season with 7 linebackers isn't very realistic.

i would love it if johnson could get traded but i think he would have to have some PT before anyone would want him and that isn't something he has had much of.

now either anderson or leman could wind up on the practice squad but i don't see them lasting there.

I know Leman wouldn't last on PS. And I'm not sure but Anderson may not be eligible for PS. What's the rule on that?

And regardless of contracts, I think the LB corps should consist of Beason, Diggs, Davis, Anderson, Connor, and Leman. I'd like to see Ivy on PS. I know we restructured Johnson's contract to avoid cutting him in the off-season, but I've had enough. His signing was a mistake, and we just need to cut our losses and move forward. Take the cap hit, and develop one of these young guys in his spot.

I don't see anyway we cut Anderson after the way he's played thus far this year. So I'm curious as to who is the first guy on the cutting block out of the LBs that have played significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think that he is being ignored. gantt seems to think that he is getting too much attention.

i think the fact that he is leading the league in preseason tackles is too hard to ignore plus the other things that he has done.

he is an opportunist which i don't see as a bad thing. he isn't the best but he sure knows how to sit back and look for opportunities and exploit them.

the unfortunate thing for us is that we have landon johnson on the roster with a huge contract that is going to force us to cut one of connor, anderson, and leman or go with 7 LBs. i really don't see connor as getting cut and going through the season with 7 linebackers isn't very realistic.

i would love it if johnson could get traded but i think he would have to have some PT before anyone would want him and that isn't something he has had much of.

now either anderson or leman could wind up on the practice squad but i don't see them lasting there.

i agree with Gantt on this one..lots of people thought his was beast after the first preason game but failed to realize that the blocked punt was because someone did not block him..all he did was run..and the sack was because are DT were thrown out the way so there was a huge hole in middle..he has done nothing leman has not and makes a lot more money he may get cut because of the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would dearly love it if a team out there gave us a conditional sixth round pick for him.

Do you think we can find a better linebacker in the sixth round? I don't.

We drafted him in the third, and he's just now really starting to show his promise. I realize we're deep at linebacker and not so deep in other areas, but I would hate to let him go for a sixth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And regardless of contracts, I think the LB corps should consist of Beason, Diggs, Davis, Anderson, Connor, and Leman. I'd like to see Ivy on PS. I know we restructured Johnson's contract to avoid cutting him in the off-season, but I've had enough. His signing was a mistake, and we just need to cut our losses and move forward. Take the cap hit, and develop one of these young guys in his spot.

I agree. Sometimes you just have to forget the money implications and go with the guys who are showing you the most. All of these guys have proven their worth to me so far, whereas, Johnson and his bigger contract havebn't.

It's not like we're not already strapped for cash already, so what the hell... give the young guys the chance to shine. Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm liking Anderson as well, but I don't think he's better than Diggs just yet. Again, Diggs is everyone's favorite guy to hate, but he's been solid for us all along and he's done well in the preseason as well. I'd love to see Johnson get traded or cut so we can keep this superstar group of six LB's we have (Beason, Davis, Diggs, Connor, Leman, Anderson). If that doesn't happen, however, we might have to regretfully say goodbye to Leman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen the games this pre-season, but what I have read is not that exciting. Almost every article I have read has given him a bad write up and I am getting the idea that people are just looking at the stats rather than the facts.

This last game the rap on him was coverage on the HB. Apparently Rice was allowed to run wild and coverage was almost singularly on him. The other 'big plays' he has made have been by play design rather than his ability and opportunities fell into his lap. So what it seems, is that he has made a lot of tackles, which considering we are down Davis and Beason is not surprising. He isn't leagues ahead of Leman though, with considering where Leman came from, makes me think Anderson is not booming quite as much as people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen the games this pre-season, but what I have read is not that exciting. Almost every article I have read has given him a bad write up and I am getting the idea that people are just looking at the stats rather than the facts.

This last game the rap on him was coverage on the HB. Apparently Rice was allowed to run wild and coverage was almost singularly on him. The other 'big plays' he has made have been by play design rather than his ability and opportunities fell into his lap. So what it seems, is that he has made a lot of tackles, which considering we are down Davis and Beason is not surprising. He isn't leagues ahead of Leman though, with considering where Leman came from, makes me think Anderson is not booming quite as much as people think.

He may have made some mistakes, but he's made more plays than any of the other guys on defense thus far. And no, I'm not making this statement off of stats, but rather on what I've seen. He looks 100x better than years past. Perhaps he's benefited from opponent's mistakes, but he's capitalized on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...