Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legal help, adverse possession laws.


Mayor Qumiby

Recommended Posts

Ok so the wife and I just bought a house. We got an estimate on a fence before our land was surveyed, during the survey we found out our property is 6 feet further back then we 1st realized.

The issue is before the survey our property line was on a hill and we would be able to go with a 6 foot fence to block the neighbors behind us. Now with the new property line it is behind the hill and we will need to go with an 8 foot fence to block the neighbors house from view.

The fence being 8 feet instead of 6 is going to cost me an extra three thousand dollars which I would rather save if I could and use it for other renovations rather than 2 feet more of fence.

I am trying to convince the wife we should just put a 6 foot fence on the hill and be done with it but she says if we don't put the fence on the property line then we could loose the land and the neighbors can claim it.

From what I've researched I found that after 20 years adverse possession could play a factor and if the neighbor made improvements to the land behind our fence then they could take it. But all they do is have cars they work on at their propert, we actually had to ask them to move a car that was on our property. But I don't see them "improving the land".

But I also read about "color of title " which properties could be obtained after 7 years but I'm having a hard time understanding that.

Instead of having a fence that goes all the way to property line i was thinking of planting 2 trees on on each corner. But I'm unsure if that's a solution or if I should just drop the extra three grand for the extended fence.

Hopefully someone here has a bit of experience here and couple provide me a little guidance.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so the wife and I just bought a house. We got an estimate on a fence before our land was surveyed, during the survey we found out our property is 6 feet further back then we 1st realized.

The issue is before the survey our property line was on a hill and we would be able to go with a 6 foot fence to block the neighbors behind us. Now with the new property line it is behind the hill and we will need to go with an 8 foot fence to block the neighbors house from view.

The fence being 8 feet instead of 6 is going to cost me an extra three thousand dollars which I would rather save if I could and use it for other renovations rather than 2 feet more of fence.

I am trying to convince the wife we should just put a 6 foot fence on the hill and be done with it but she says if we don't put the fence on the property line then we could loose the land and the neighbors can claim it.

From what I've researched I found that after 20 years adverse possession could play a factor and if the neighbor made improvements to the land behind our fence then they could take it. But all they do is have cars they work on at their propert, we actually had to ask them to move a car that was on our property. But I don't see them "improving the land".

But I also read about "color of title " which properties could be obtained after 7 years but I'm having a hard time understanding that.

Instead of having a fence that goes all the way to property line i was thinking of planting 2 trees on on each corner. But I'm unsure if that's a solution or if I should just drop the extra three grand for the extended fence.

Hopefully someone here has a bit of experience here and couple provide me a little guidance.

Thanks

Do this. But make em' pot plants. Call the police when they get ripe, and no more neighbors!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Giant arborvitae is a great choice on trees for screen. You can start small if you like. One gallon pots could be 2ft tall and around $10 a piece.If you want instant privacy I would go with some in 15 gallon pots. They could be as tall as 6 ft. Plant 4 1/2 to 5 ft apart. Fast growers and highly recommend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had something happen that was similar to this that might help. In my previous home (my ex still lives there with my daughter) we had a split rail fence that was 5-6 feet in front of where our property line was. On the other side of that fence was small trees / shrubs that blocked the view to the neighbors behind us because the split rail fence was only about 4 feet high.  I bought the house this way and didn't realize that I had another 5 feet until one of my neighbors told us a couple years after we lived there. 

 

Fast forward a couple years later and she gets new neighbors behind the house and they get a property survey done. My ex went to church one day and all the trees and bushes that were on the other side of the fence were cut down. The neighbor claimed that my ex gave her permission to do that which she denied. I still own the home but was not living there at the time and wanted nothing to do with this mess.

 

This started a crazy neighbor like feud and my ex actually sued them for cutting down the trees / shrubs. Even though the trees were on the other side of the fence and the neighbor claimed we abandoned the property because the area was not maintained, she lost and had to pay a few hundred bucks for each tree / shrub they cut down which turned out to be rather expensive for her. My ex then used some of that money to build a 6 ft. privacy fence so she didn't have to look at her anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran into something similar here in Cali. The property line shown when we bought the house was different than the fence line that was there. It turned out to be on a little slant so when we bought the new fence and me and my neighbors went half, they actually had to pay a bit more for a retaining wall underneath. They wanted us to pay for it but I told them no way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Giant arborvitae is a great choice on trees for screen. You can start small if you like. One gallon pots could be 2ft tall and around $10 a piece.If you want instant privacy I would go with some in 15 gallon pots. They could be as tall as 6 ft. Plant 4 1/2 to 5 ft apart. Fast growers and highly recommend.

Can you cap their growth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Giant arborvitae is a great choice on trees for screen. You can start small if you like. One gallon pots could be 2ft tall and around $10 a piece.If you want instant privacy I would go with some in 15 gallon pots. They could be as tall as 6 ft. Plant 4 1/2 to 5 ft apart. Fast growers and highly recommend.

 

You need to trim them right or else they look like Christmas Trees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...