Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Devin Smith still on the board


Rags

Recommended Posts

I think we want to, but I think he'll have to slide at least another 10-12 picks for him to be in range for what Gettleman would be willing to give up to move up.

I have us trading with the Giants at 40. Might need to slide more though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have us trading with the Giants at 40. Might need to slide more though.

 

That would likely take our 2nd and 3rd rounders and Gettleman won't do that.  Honestly, it's probably around pick #50 where we can start watching for a potential trade up.  Our 2nd and 4th can get us in the ballpark there and I think that's about what Gettleman would be wiling to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm willing to bet my last pair of nipple shorts we'll trade up for him.

 

 

The Huddle 2015 Draft:

 

 

 

48. San Diego- Sammie Coats, WR, Auburn

49. Kansas City- Breshad Perriman, WR, UCF

50. Buffalo- Benardrick McKinney, OLB, Mississippi St

51. Houston- Devin Funchess, TE, Michigan

52. Philadelphia- Jake Fisher, OL, Oregon

53. Cincinnati- Preston Smith, DE, Mississippi St

54. Detroit- Ronald Darby, CB, FSU

55. Arizona- Byron Jones, CB, UConn

56. St. Louis (from Pittsburgh)- Garrett Grayson, QB, Colorado St

57. Carolina- Devin Smith, WR, OSU

58. Baltimore- Eli Harold, OLB, Virginia

59. Denver- Stephone Anthony, LB, Clemson

60. Dallas- Jay Ajayi, RB, Boise St

61. Indianapolis- Paul Dawson, ILB, TCU

62. Green Bay- Rashad Greene, WR FSU

63. Seattle- Phillip Dorsett, WR, Miami

64. New England- Henry Anderson, DE/ DT, Stanford

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...