Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

On Cam Newton’s Birthday, a Look at His First Four Seasons


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

**DISCLAIMER THIS IS NOT MY WORK**

 

Just found a good read over at ''Black and Blue Review''

 

Pro Football Reference, one of the most helpful sites around for stat heads, tweeted an interesting chart they built on Monday. As Panthers quarterback Cam Newton was celebrating his 26th birthday, PFREF compared his numbers to what 34 other starting quarterbacks put up in their first four seasons. You can find a slimmer version of the table below, but first, some notes:

 

(Click link for the full read -- Comment here if you have thoughts)

 

http://blackandbluereview.com/cam-newton-first-four-seasons/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The entire first part is pretty misleading/irrelevant.... He has the fourth most games played.... And then they go on to talk about how he is really high up on these other QB's in terms of these other stats.... Well of course he is going to be high up there, he played more games!

The interesting part, is where he rates in the chart below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just that it seems like a strange group of guys to compare him to and then make a point about where he falls within that group (largely in the top 3rd). But the eclectic group of QBs include a guy from 1927, Dan Marino, and Josh Freeman. With that strange collection, I'm not sure what any of it means. Maybe I just can't get past the disparate grouping and it's just trying to point out his stats compared to a wide variety of players. I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they choose those specific 34 QBs to compare him to? It seems like a random collection of QBs that kind of muddies the point.

 

Was thinking the same thing, some omissions from the list too, no Rivers, Romo, Brady, Brees? I mean, is there really any point comparing Cam to Namath, Kelly and Garcia? 

 

Nice thought, confusing execution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they choose those specific 34 QBs to compare him to? It seems like a random collection of QBs that kind of muddies the point.

 

I'm no NFL Historian or buff, but if I had to guess the list appears to  comprised of only ''STARTING ROOKIE QB's'' in their first four seasons. 

 

I think that is why we see such a varied list of players by comparison and that is why Brees, Rogers, Brady etc. are not included.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Not included in the chart: Newton’s 33 rushing touchdowns are the most by a QB in his first four seasons; he’s the only player in NFL history to have 10,000 passing yards and 2,000 rushing yards in his first four seasons and the first to have at least 3,000 passing yards and 500 rushing yards in four consecutive seasons."

Dats mah QB!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they choose those specific 34 QBs to compare him to? It seems like a random collection of QBs that kind of muddies the point.

 

 

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny.cgi?id=wrZPo

 

 

I'm guessing those 35 (Cam included) were the only qbs to start at least 50 games over their first four years?

 

 

 

For combined seasons, from 1920 to 2015, from 1st to 4th season, played QB, requiring Games Started >= 50,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No wonder David Carr got knocked out of the league.

208 sacks in 4 seasons... 43 more sacks than the next closest who is Jake Plummer and Cam is 4th highest.

That doesn't count all the near sacks, what the hell kinda line did the Texans give him for those kind of numbers for a non-running QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...