Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Cam bring in 100 million?


CamMoon

Recommended Posts

The 'market dictates things like sport contracts', but the fact of the matter is very few athletes are actually worth the money they make. Take a player like the NBAs Joe Johnson. Signed a max contract back in 09 for 120 million because the 'market demanded it'. A casual NBA fan has no idea who he is or who he plays for. 2 years later he was traded and pawned off on another sucker. The Atlanta Hawks probably lost money during the whole ordeal. I say very few athletes are worth the money they make because how many can make that money back? Lebron makes 20 million a year but between Jerseys, tickets, merch and TV ratings the Cavs make back whatever they pay him. With no knowledge of how the Panthers do with Jersey sells, tickets or TV ratings, I'm guessing we're in a better position now than we were in 2010. Again I'm guessing but I'm sure JR will make that 100m back from Cam's contract, because Cam is such a marketable figure. Forget the stuff on the field. None of the "young QBs" have resurrected a franchise like Cam. So that's that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say so and not only to the Panthers, but for the city as well.  Remember all those prime time games in 2010?  yeah, me neither.  The more success he has, the more Charlotte is exposed, and with that more money flows into town.  Everybody wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2014, Forbes magazine rated the Carolina Panthers as an organization valued at $1.25 billion (Billion!) and the team brought in $283 million in revenues for 2013. That year, salary cap for a team's players was $123 million. 

Even figuring in team expenses beyond salary and a host of other expenses, the earning potential of even a mid-range team like ours is phenomenal. A celebrity player like Cam will bring in a host of money from not just diehard fans, but from those drawn to him. Each national commercial he does for any product, probably drags in a few jersey sales. And if he proves to be a big time winner, the number of bandwagon fans than climb aboard just shoots the earnings ever upwards.

And some of those bandwagon fans will stay on, building a team earning base that grows through feast and famine years alike. The Dallas Cowboys are the most valuable NFL team at over $3 billion and have become so following that formula. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you look at almost all Daniels stats, they are as good or better than last year minus perhaps Completion Percentage. I don't think Daniels himself is having very much less individual success than the Redskins are reverting to the mean.  https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46003861/nfl-teams-likely-decline-lose-more-games-2025-season-predictions-vikings-chiefs-commanders-lions-colts#wsh Barnwell wrote about them in the preseason as a team that had an inordinate amount of luck or success in one score games that wasn't very likely to be repeated.
    • We thinking of the same Mike White? He probably won’t even make it off the practice squad.
    • I would heavily push back on the notion of Tomlin and Cowher inheriting "collapsed teams." From 1980 to 1991(prior to Cowher and after their Super Bowl victories) the Steelers experienced just 4 sub .500 seasons. In fact the winning percentage for those years was 0.505. At most that was relatively mediocre, something fairly akin to the pre-Tepper Panthers. From Cowher through Tomlin(1992 to Present) it has been the NFL's best franchise. 22 playoff appearances, 4 Super Bowl Appearances, 2 Titles, 15 times winning the division. In fact they have only experienced 3 sub .500 records in that 34 season span.  That isn't ever a scenario where rebuilding happens. It's constant and consistent retooling so that your franchise floor is always high. It's smart business decisions, exceptional drafting and quality personnel moves that create a situation where that floor STAYS high.  It was precisely BECAUSE we opted to go through a complete teardown and "rebuild" without any of that competence being in the organization at all that led us to where we are currently. A situation that will more than likely continue for well over a decade longer.  Long term successful franchises do not "rebuild." They are in a constant state of competent flux that sustains them through some leaner periods without ripping the foundation completely out that led to that success in the first place. 
×
×
  • Create New...