Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2015 NBA Draft Thread


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

The buzz on Twitter for the last 18 hours has been Lamb and pick 14 for Barnes and pick 9. So it looks like it will end up being Rindour and pick 9 since reports of Barnes not ending up in OKC were accurate.

My prediction is Booker with pick 9 and Hunter with pick 14. I really hope we end up with Booker some how. We need shooting and Hunter has bust written all over him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have got to do something to get more length and scoring from the PG position, brian roberts just doesn't cut it.  I'm still holding out hope that we can nab d'angelo russell via trade up or otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have got to do something to get more length and scoring from the PG position, brian roberts just doesn't cut it.  I'm still holding out hope that we can nab d'angelo russell via trade up or otherwise.

Russell will go either 2 or 3. No way we can trade up that far. Best bet is to move up to 5 or 6 and get mudiay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...