Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke's Contract Talks are Heating up


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I don't understand why some of you are so eager to want to pay Luke, a 4-3 LBer, $13-15 million per year.  You do realize that would be an absolutely terrible contract for us, right?  Especially considering the market was literally just set for 4-3 LBers with the Wagner and David contracts.

You know what the highest per year average for a 4-3 LBer is right now?  $10.5 million.  Lol, I love Luke, and he is indeed the best... but he's not getting $3-5+ million per year more than the next highest guy.  That would be fuging nonsensical, and it's how you end right back up in cap hell.

It seems we've got a bunch of regular Marty Hurney's around here.

I certainly don't WANT to pay Luke that much, but he does make our team better.  There is no way around it, we either pay him, or we don't, same with Cam.  When you have the best player at his position in the NFL, you have to break them down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at his current rate of production, a 12-year career for cam would land him 51,000 all purpose yards. his passing yardage would be at 43500, good enough for 11th all time, over dan fouts and just behind drew bledsoe. a 14-year career at that rate would push him past john elway.

yards is far from the only GOAT metric but cam has done some pretty special stuff so far

Not disagreeing, just saying that this GOAT stuff with Cam is way way premature, if not downright foolish.

I feel no differently when I hear it about Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly don't WANT to pay Luke that much, but he does make our team better.  There is no way around it, we either pay him, or we don't, same with Cam.  When you have the best player at his position in the NFL, you have to break them down.

Don't worry, we're not paying Luke that much.  That was the whole point of my post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam has a longgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg way to go before we can even consider the GOAT talk.  poo, in my opinion hes got to at least be Top 5 before we start that talk.  Right now he's an enigma for us as Panther fans.  He can make all the throws a bad ass NFL QB can make.  The issues with Cam are his dumb ass decisions he makes, lack of dumping the ball off, and footwork problems, which are all so damn aggravating to us.  If he can work on the first two, his progression will be immense.  Because the third one looks set in stone.  Roast me all you want (not just you @thefuzz.  I don't really care.  

What exactly do you define as "dumb ass decisions"?

In general from what I've seen he makes good decisions with the football for the most part. Newton is not one who will just lob a pass into triple or quadruple coverage, or something asinine like that which would qualify as a "dumb ass decision". His accuracy isn't as consistent as it should be yet, but that goes back to footwork, and we know he's been working on it. Nothing is going to just happen overnight, it takes repetition, and also consistent trust in his OL.

I think the "GOAT" stuff is just fans being fans. There is a balance. Newton isn't elite yet, he can certainly work his way there, but he is without a doubt a special player as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke likely isn't going to get paid $15m per year, but the absolute minimum is going to be $11m per year. Why? That's what his 2016 option is at. Assume the Panthers don't reach an extension and franchise tag him the next two years. He'll either get paid the average of the top 5 LBs or 120% of his 2016 salary, whichever is higher. The tag for LBs in 2015 was $13.2m. 120% of his $11m 2016 option is $13.2m (and then tagging him again the year after would be $15.8m).

 

So if you're Luke, why would you take a deal that averages $10m per season when your 3-year pay following the 2015 season is going to be ~$40m? You don't.

 

Bottom line, Luke's deal at worst is going to average $11m per year, and it's likely to average something closer to $12-13m than it is $10m because that's the leverage he's got, and you're damn right he's going to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why some of you are so eager to want to pay Luke, a 4-3 LBer, $13-15 million per year.  You do realize that would be an absolutely terrible contract for us, right?  Especially considering the market was literally just set for 4-3 LBers with the Wagner and David contracts.

You know what the highest per year average for a 4-3 LBer is right now?  $10.5 million.  Lol, I love Luke, and he is indeed the best... but he's not getting $3-5+ million per year more than the next highest guy.  That would be fuging nonsensical, and it's how you end right back up in cap hell.

It seems we've got a bunch of regular Marty Hurney's around here.

They didn't set the market, they are getting paid virtually the same thing as Beason and Willis did "10 million a season" and that was set 5 years ago now.

 

Luke is the one that's going to reset the ILB market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly do you define as "dumb ass decisions"?

In general from what I've seen he makes good decisions with the football for the most part. Newton is not one who will just lob a pass into triple or quadruple coverage, or something asinine like that which would qualify as a "dumb ass decision". His accuracy isn't as consistent as it should be yet, but that goes back to footwork, and we know he's been working on it. Nothing is going to just happen overnight, it takes repetition, and also consistent trust in his OL.

I think the "GOAT" stuff is just fans being fans. There is a balance. Newton isn't elite yet, he can certainly work his way there, but he is without a doubt a special player as well.

I respect your respectable response, sir.

 

Dumb ass decisions are when he scrambles and continues to try to do too much in an instance where throwing the ball away would be more effective.  Does the scrambling work sometimes?  Yes, but when it doesn't, boy is it atrocious.  And usually ends up with the other team having the ball and most of us face palming.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still expecting something like 13.7 a season for 5 years. Making him the highest paid NFL LB by a few million over the life of the contract.

I am thinking that is a bit rich.  I guess he will bring in about $11m per season over 5 or 6 seasons in new money.  I think he will accept a longer-term deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...