Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Practice Squad Signings


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

PRACTICE SQUAD

POSPLAYEREXPCOLLEGE
DTChas Alecxih1Pittsburgh
WRBrenton Bersin2Wofford
LBBrian BlechenRUtah
WRCarrington Byndom1Texas
WRDamiere ByrdRSouth Carolina
DERakim Cox1Villanova
OTDavid Foucault2Montreal
LBAdarius Glanton2Florida Atlantic
TEScott Simonson1Assumption
CBLou Young1Georgia Tech
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the 7 players Voth indicated might find places on the PS:

http://blackandbluereview.com/players-panthers-would-like-to-put-on-practice-squad/

Per league sources, Carolina has expressed interest in putting at least these seven players on the practice squad, as long as they clear waivers:

  • WR Damiere Byrd
  • TE Scott Simonson
  • OT David Foucault
  • DE Rakim Cox
  • DT Chas Alecxih
  • LB Brian Blechen
  • LB Adarius Glanton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree re: Redden.  Does anyone know whether Marcus Lucas could be eligible?

I wouldn't mind Foucault not making the PS.  I think we might have other OLine candidates who are stronger.  Ricky Henry, Martin Wallace.

We might need some CB help too - could we PS Byndom or Lou Young?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been an intense camp... There were battles at damn near every postion on offense and most of the defense too.

I like it. I can believe how bad of a GM Hurney really was. This is gettleman getting involved. I think he subscribes to the 'moneyball' manageing technique, or I mean more so than most GMs.

I think we went from the worst GM in the league to the best.

Gettlemen's three drafts (16 total picks, 7 total picks in rounds 1-3):  Lotulelei, Short (name the best DT Hurney ever drafted), Klein, Benjamin, Ealy, Turner, Boston, Benwikere, Thompson, Funchess, Williams, Artis-Payne---I see all starting by next year with the exception of 5th round Klein, who has started.  That is over half of the starting roster.  Throw in Brown, Norwell, Wegher, Marlowe, Coleman, Mitchell, Ginn, Oher, Dickson, etc. etc.  etc. and that is how you build a champion while still digging out of Hurney's debt and bad contracts--some still on the books.  Hats off to GMAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we went from the worst GM in the league to the best.

Gettlemen's three drafts (16 total picks, 7 total picks in rounds 1-3):  Lotulelei, Short , Klein, Benjamin, Ealy, Turner, Boston, Benwikere, Thompson, Funchess, Williams, Artis-Payne---I see all starting by next year with the exception of 5th round Klein, who has started.  That is over half of the starting roster.  Throw in Brown, Norwell, Wegher, Marlowe, Coleman, Mitchell, Ginn, Oher, Dickson, etc. etc.  etc. and that is how you build a champion while still digging out of Hurney's debt and bad contracts--some still on the books.  Hats off to GMAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a question.  Could Coby White be a solid replacement for Ball? Seems he could be an upgrade. Seems he played well in replacement of Ball.  I normally get the highlights and don't get to see any games but I liked when White was on on the court. 
    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
×
×
  • Create New...