Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam only completed 46 percent of his passes to KB

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
  • Author
Posted

And that 46% was good enough for a rookie to have over 1,000 yards and almost double digit TD's. Funny how as soon as we don't have a player for one reason or another we automatically go from praising them to saying "Eh he wasn't that good anyways".

Did anybody in this thread say that?  No, nobody did.  I just posted a quote from ESPN and their Power Rankings.  That's all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nick_81 Newbie

Nick_81

Posted
Posted

And that 46% was good enough for a rookie to have over 1,000 yards and almost double digit TD's. Funny how as soon as we don't have a player for one reason or another we automatically go from praising them to saying "Eh he wasn't that good anyways".

"We" aren't the one's saying that.  The d-bag doing the power ranking at ESPN is.  I think "we" have a pretty good understanding of KB's impact, or loss thereof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersUnited Newbie

PanthersUnited

Posted
Posted

And that 46% was good enough for a rookie to have over 1,000 yards and almost double digit TD's. Funny how as soon as we don't have a player for one reason or another we automatically go from praising them to saying "Eh he wasn't that good anyways".

I have always said that KB was good but not as good as his stats indicated, I already made a thread about this actually. A ton of his stats came in garbage time, while yes other receivers get stats in garbage time, KB was higher than average.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

So they have us at 19?

 

Man I love the disrespect. Put that article up on the bulletin board.

 

Cards, Bengals, Lions Chiefs, Dolphins, Vikings and Bills have no business being ahead of us. 

if you put us over all those teams heading in....where do you actually have is ranked? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doyle Collaborator

Doyle

Posted
Posted

I love how butt hurt people get when someone posts an actual stat.  Not an opinion but a stat.  I was sick at my stomach when KB went down but after a couple of days I realized he doesn't make or break our team by a long shot.  If we suck this year we were going to suck anyways whether we had KB or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Johnstonny
      Ekwonu doesn’t get dog walked under 2 minutes in the 4th, we drive, kick a FG and win

      By Johnstonny · Posted

      Icky is a marshmellow....
    • UnluckyforSome
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...