Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

# 1 Defense


Smithers

Recommended Posts

Doesn't matter when the front 7 completely shuts down the run game, gives the QB no time to throw, Luke/TD are roaming in the middle and Norman has the #1 WR locked down. 

Get Kuechly/Star healthy and they can stick a Huddler at FS.

The qb had no time? What game were you watching? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A game without Lotulelei & Kuechly. The premise of that conversation is that even with those two back we aren't elite. Which is absurd. We held Jax to 9 points with a top 5 DT & arguably the best defensive player in the league on the sideline. 

Stick Kuechly in the middle of the field and Lotulelei clogging up the middle and it's a different ballgame. They were double teaming Johnson. Try that with Star/KK beside him and 330+ pounds is gonna be slamming your QB into the ground. 

 

Yes, I'm saying that even with Star and Kuechly, we have major holes at safety and defensive end. We are top 15. Maybe even to ten, but we are not an elite defense from what I saw today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awful is a very strong word to describe our safeties. I would describe them as average. When you get absolutely no pressure on the QB until the 4th quarter, they will definitely look average. But with a healthy Luke and Star, the front 7 should run in perfect harmony allowing our DB's to feast on shitty throws.

As many missed tackles and coverages they had today, I would say they looked awful. It was brutal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...