Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stack The Box and Roll Coverage To Greg Olsen.. Because They have No Receivers


propagandamachine

Recommended Posts

Seems like a pretty solid plan.

maybe a WR does the unthinkable and catches a ball.....maybe Newton sits back way too long in the pocket and arguably the best front we see all year feasts on that bc that is exactly what they want to play out 

Let's be real....we are mocking them and our counter is essentially go ahead Philly Brown gonna get you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I foresee more two TE sets this game and a lot of running back checkdowns due to pressure.  Gotta get yards--just get yards.  Cam is learning that.  And yes, he did spread it around to NINE (9) guys. It may take 8 of them to match KB, but if that's what it takes, then that's what it takes.  Throw in Olsen, and we still have essentially a two receiving threats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is more depressing: CRA or AceBoogie? 

so anything other than homerism is depressing?

Texans have some nice match ups.  That is just football.   People take great issue with those things or discussing our team in any way but sunshine and cotton candy dreams. 

I think we can win.   Just in a different manner than some think we do.  

I am what I am at this point.  As one of Cam's biggest supporters since before it was cool....one day I will eventually want him cut and it will probably before most are ready.  So I guess that should give everyone plenty of warning 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so anything other than homerism is depressing?

Texans have some nice match ups.  That is just football.   People take great issue with those things or discussing our team in any way but sunshine and cotton candy dreams. 

I think we can win.   Just in a different manner than some think we do.  

I am what I am at this point.  As one of Cam's biggest supporters since before it was cool....one day I will eventually want him cut and it will probably before most are ready.  So I guess that should give everyone plenty of warning 

I'm really just joking around, but man you never seem to have anything nice to say about the team.  Ever. 

Everyone knows this will be a tough game..  They all will be.  But we can win this one, just like we can win the next one and the next one, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really just joking around, but man you never seem to have anything nice to say about the team.  Ever. 

Everyone knows this will be a tough game..  They all will be.  But we can win this one, just like we can win the next one and the next one, etc

well it is no secret I prefer to talk about the concerns....more interesting to me 

I mean how many times can we say Luke is awesome?  Been there, done that and bought the jersey.   

I got us 3-1 heading into the bye....is that super negative? I don't think so.  But unless you have us 4-0 then there have to be some losing matchups

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be an optimist, but until proven otherwise, that's the approach to take to this offense. Shut down the run, smother the one proven receiving threat, and for good measure make sure our notoriously mobile QB gets taken down on a regular basis. Dare us to air it out and try to win the one-on-one match ups downfield. No one is afraid of us there and they have no reason to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well it is no secret I prefer to talk about the concerns....more interesting to me 

I mean how many times can we say Luke is awesome?  Been there, done that and bought the jersey.   

I got us 3-1 heading into the bye....We need it

I'd prefer 4-0.  But all of a sudden, Seattle and indy don't seem as scary. But I know not to overreact to week 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahahhahahha... i am going to enjoy Cam Newton feast :) 

 

I remember during the game when announcer said.. Cam had spread the Ball around to over 5 receivers or something to that effect. 

 

Star was out, Luke was Out and this Defense played LIGHTS OUT... 

 

This will be Fantastic. 

I thought he said 9 different receivers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That would be crazy especially to us because our pick took Williams. And all the other talent we provided for them.  Tbey were smart we were stupid.   
    • If you look at almost every QB in a team with a winning record or consistently in the playoffs their QB averages over 200 ypg. Here are a few ypg averages for 2025: Daniel Jones: 267, that is with an amazing RB. Mahomes: 261, that was with a few games without some of his weapons Baker: 239, lost his best weapon and still is putting up numbers Penix: 232, Falcons are floundering and Penix ypg is still higher than Bryce's Allen: 229 Lawrence: 230 Bryce: 173 and he isn't anywhere close to these other QBs. I included two teams that are not that great and Lawrence is not that good and still is posting higher passing stats then Bryce. Bryce has got to get his passing stats higher if he wants to keep his job. I want to win a Super Bowl and a QB struggling to pass 150 yards a game will not cut it. No, the conservative playcalling is not because of the young receivers and o-line. It is because Canales knows he is limited with Bryce and has to work around him.  Bryce has struggled to pass ever since he entered the league and 3 years in it is obvious he will never be a QB that can be relied to win the game with his arm. 
    • Should be at least 24 to 10
×
×
  • Create New...