Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What I would like to see


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

I, like most of you, am very happy be 4-0 heading into the bye week.  Many predicted less.  Now we come to the test that will show who we are.

I personally see us heading into Green Bay 7-0 and our game being the Game of the Week. 

Seattle, WE SHOULD BEAT.  Our defense is as tough as theirs and we got a chip.  Jimmy Graham is pooing his pants because Thomas Davis is going spend a couple hours knocking the crap out of him.  (I have never seen a player react as to an individual player as I have seen Graham act towards TD) Anyhow, 12 man or not.  We should win this game.

Philly isn't as daunting as they we when the schedule came out.  Film is out on this this style and IMO Chip Kelly is losing his locker room already.

Indy,  I hope the interception machine plays and Cam outshines him because I cannot stand the Luck hype and the Colts are not that good either.

7-0 going into a home game with GB.  BOA Stadium will rock.

Now to my topic.

I would like to see our running game get more than 2 yds a carry. (not including Cam)  Seems the majority of our runs are less than 2 yard.  Which takes me to my second point. 

WR keep stepping up.   It is good to see Bersin getting passes and Ginn making plays but I would like to see us get Funchess online.  I would take an early play and get Funchess the ball.  Let him shake the Jitters and hopefully get him in the groove as we face these better teams.

Defense tight up.  I know Luke has been out but we seem so blah.  Hopefully, Luke is back in time for Seattle because he is going to be a difference maker.  Klien is solid and our defense is good with him a MLB. But Carolina Sports the best MLB in the game and he changes our defense from good to great.  

Finally,  Special Teams don't put us in a bind.  NO more put returns and no more blocked FGs.   We might need those points against our next opponents. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the confidence in this thread but over looking opponents is not a good idea.  Seattle in Seattle is a problem by itself. Let's take it one game at a time folks. 

Not at all over looking anyone.  My point is we should beat those teams.  Though we have things we need to fix  (part two of the OP) we are good enough to beat these guys.  Seattle, Philly and Indy have not shown me anything that would make be think they are better than us.

Yes we are going to Seattle and they got the 12th man. Got it.  Our defense is going to make things rough on Wilson.  Outside of divisional opponents we have face the Seahawks more than anyone else.  We know them well.   Time to come up with a W.   I don't believe this is overlooking Seattle.  Overlooking Seattle is saying this game is a Lock.

Philly is spiraling out of control and by week 7 they may be done.  They  have traded all their talent away, the talent they brought in they don't use.  This is a very winnable game and if we play smart Panther football we should win.

Finally, Indy.  I think this will be tough but Indy line is terrible.  Their running game scares no one and Luck will throw Picks. Winnable game.

Are these LOCK games, not a chance.  Should we win, Yes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...