Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calling a penalty after a review

chknwing

By chknwing,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CoastalCat Newbie

CoastalCat

Posted
Posted

I don't think I have ever seen a review that resulted in a penalty being called.  And it happened twice last night.  you sure as hell cant challenge a penalty and have it reversed.  Very odd.

It was weird. I guess the fact that they threw the flag, then picked it up, meant that a reversal of the no-call was a call. I suppose it did get to the right place. It was pass interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chknwing Veteran

chknwing

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It was weird. I guess the fact that they threw the flag, then picked it up, meant that a reversal of the no-call was a call. I suppose it did get to the right place. It was pass interference.

I can agree with that but the sideline catch that resulted in a penalty that was never called originally?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jase Apprentice

Jase

Posted
Posted

So last night, We had:

a butt-interception,

the ground causing an interception,

a pass interference after review that occured a split second before the ball hit the ground 7 yards away,

an illegal touch penalty that came after review,

and two interceptions that hit the ground that should've been reviewed but weren't

 

Let's just call this a weird fuging game

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

It was weird. I guess the fact that they threw the flag, then picked it up, meant that a reversal of the no-call was a call. I suppose it did get to the right place. It was pass interference.

It was NOT pass interference lol.

For their to be PI, the pass has to be catchable... that ball landed 10 ft away from the receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
osd22 Enthusiast

osd22

Posted
Posted

It was NOT pass interference lol.

For their to be PI, the pass has to be catchable... that ball landed 10 ft away from the receiver.

But if Luke hadn`t smacked the guy to the ground he would have made a five yard diving catch. LOL ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalCat Newbie

CoastalCat

Posted
Posted

So last night, We had:

a butt-interception,

the ground causing an interception,

a pass interference after review that occured a split second before the ball hit the ground 7 yards away,

an illegal touch penalty that came after review,

and two interceptions that hit the ground that should've been reviewed but weren't

 

Let's just call this a weird fuging game

Having trouble arguing with the PI call. In stride, I think the receiver would have gotten there if he hadn't been pushed. Anyone have a gif?

EDIT: To clarify, I was talking about the one down the right sideline, not the one that was deep in Eagles territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Canales needs to concentrate on coaching

      By Waldo · Posted

      That should have been this year. Tough to sell to anyone worth getting when this crew is going into year 3 on the hot seat. I still think keeping Evero will sink them all after last year's showing. If/when he is scapegoated they need to show improvement or it's likely to be so eone else's problem next year. I do agree in principle tho, it all should have happened after last year's problems. 
    • PanthersNCSU
      ESPN's Benjamin Solak on Bryce Young

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I've listened to some things that have calmed the "Bryce was flat out terrible" to just "he was really bad" in Week 1. It's Year 3 though, and that shouldn't be the barometer. I've got 1% hope left for Bryce, and that's just blind homerism coming out.  I'm scared that as much emphasis as the team places on advanced stats and PFF that the team *doesn't* think Bryce was that bad in Week 1. Couple that with so many of the QBs in the league looking rough, offense being down in general, and I feel like there's a lot of "what if's" going on in the building instead of facing the music.  Lose Week 2, and we should switch the main focus back to building/churning the roster, evaluating young guys, and hoping our next QB can have a Jayden Daniels level of impact. As we're all well too aware of, QB is a crapshoot a lot of the time. Admit we made a bad pick, and go draft another. And another. Repeat until correct.     
    • UnluckyforSome
      5 Names to Know

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I wouldn't want any of those starting as a rookie on day 1.  That said, we need a vet, that is not Andy Dalton, that can be the starter while a prospect grows and learns on the sidelines.
×
×
  • Create New...