Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers Is Mad


beastson

Recommended Posts

You know what? fug Aaron Rodgers. There, I said it.

He won his one Super Bowl 5 years ago and before that he was known as a really good QB that couldn't get it done. This notion that he's superhuman is ridiculous. 

People saying dumb poo like, "He's the Michael Jordan of football." Please. Last time I checked, he's going to need about 5 more rings before he can be mentioned in the same breath as MJ. Fuging a dude. Ok. End rant. I feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Haplo E said:

QBs can get mad all they want, they don't catch their own passes or generate their own offense. Cam is the only QB in the league who generate his own offense whether receivers catch the ball or not. So, Rodgers can just shut up and go sit down next to the punter and kicker.

 

Pretty sure WRs still have to catch the ball for Carolina to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading the GB boards, a number of Pack fans are criticizing his play over the last few games. They feel he is too cautious at times, because he doesn't like interceptions on his stat line, with the result that he leaves plays on the field.

I haven't watched them enough to know if it's true or not, but it's an interesting perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

You know what? fug Aaron Rodgers. There, I said it.

He won his one Super Bowl 5 years ago and before that he was known as a really good QB that couldn't get it done. This notion that he's superhuman is ridiculous. 

People saying dumb poo like, "He's the Michael Jordan of football." Please. Last time I checked, he's going to need about 5 more rings before he can be mentioned in the same breath as MJ. Fuging a dude. Ok. End rant. I feel better.

Really, you want to fug a dude?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've shown you numerous comps for other tackles in the same age and talent range.  His contract, taking into account his age, health, etc.  is the going rate.  It's a fair deal. I've shown you examples of how long it usually takes to find even an average replacement.  Hell, look at every tackle that has ever started for the Panthers.  How many would you consider a success?  They are not easy to find. After everything we've done with this team since drafting Bryce why would we decide to let our best linemen go and add a huge question mark at tackle?   FA is a crapshoot in which any guy available will have cons/issues.  If not, they'll cost a fortune.   Outside of a first or maybe 2nd round pic next year it'll take a few years for a tackle to learn the position at the NFL level.  There are still questions about Icky. Every vet NFL player deals with maintenance.  Between the contract value and history I'm not overly worried about his knee.  I contend his knee issue isn't anything to be overly worried about.  It's not zero risk but it's an acceptable risk.  Every player we draft and every contract we sign has risk.  You're blowing up his own negative words about his knees and ignoring him saying he is healthy and the knee is a non issue.  You have a strong chicken little complex with this team.  Being he has always been a Panther they are very aware of any health issues. We paid now because now is cheaper.  If his knee was really an issue they would have waited.  That tells me it's not the issue you want it to be.    
    • Sauls getting cut by Steelers if no trade happens.
    • No they are going to give Claudin Cherelus 2 spots. 
×
×
  • Create New...