Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Given our remaining schedule, do we run the table?

SamMills4Life

By SamMills4Life,
in Carolina Panthers

Predict our final record.   

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Predict our final record.

    • 16-0, all the way Baby!
      40
    • 15-1, noboby's perfect. We will mess up somewhere.
      15
    • 14-2, having lost ealier, and having locked up the #1 seed we rest our starters against the Bucs.
      7
    • 11-5 (just checking how many opposing fans are on our board)
      2

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

We should but nothing is certain.

I'm really looking at individual match ups. I said in another thread that if Norman shuts down obj he should win dpoy. That guy is fuging insane and always gets his regardless if they win or lose. Norman is the only guy I can think of that matches his athleticism and ball skills. Obj is quick as fug. It's gonna be tough for Norman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersGOATFan336 Grand Master

PanthersGOATFan336

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, SamMills4Life said:

As the Redskins just sealed their win against the Giants, it looks like every team we play the rest of the year just lost this week.

It's been fun just joking about it, but we are realistically looking like we can run the table. For the first time this year, I think we will.

 

"There's going to be a lot of talk, a lot of speculation, but the truth of the matter is it should only be geared to the next game," head coach Ron Rivera said. "I know this much: The next possibility is 12. We'll continue to take that one-game-at-a-time mentality. We can't get ahead of ourselves. We can't look at what the possibilities are other than what's in front of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SamMills4Life Newbie

SamMills4Life

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

We should but nothing is certain.

I'm really looking at individual match ups. I said in another thread that if Norman shuts down obj he should win dpoy. That guy is fuging insane and always gets his regardless if they win or lose. Norman is the only guy I can think of that matches his athleticism and ball skills. Obj is quick as fug. It's gonna be tough for Norman.

That catch today was sick. You put in anyone in our roster in that position and that's an incomplete pass 100/100 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersGOATFan336 Grand Master

PanthersGOATFan336

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Nothing but garbage left. The answer is absolutely yes, 16-0.

"Teams that worry too much about the future or dwell too much on the past, you are not putting all your energy into winning one game that week," Olsen said. "It's hard to win in this league. The margin for error is very small.

"It takes all of your focus each week to win a game at this level. I don't think you get yourself too wrapped in what's ahead."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SamMills4Life Newbie

SamMills4Life

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

"There's going to be a lot of talk, a lot of speculation, but the truth of the matter is it should only be geared to the next game," head coach Ron Rivera said. "I know this much: The next possibility is 12. We'll continue to take that one-game-at-a-time mentality. We can't get ahead of ourselves. We can't look at what the possibilities are other than what's in front of us.

Rivera is right, I really hope he can keep the team in that sort of mentality. Complacency is for chumps.

That said, we're just a bunch of stupid fans. We're free to think what we want to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i think we can do it and probably will do it....mainly because the rest of the teams on the schedule suck.

 

we could go with cam and luke sitting out and pull it off fairly easily. that's not being cocky, that's just noticing how bad the falcons, saints, giants, and bucs are. all of them lost today, most lost to teams we already beat. none of these games today were really close.

the only team i am at all cautious about is the cardinals, but even then we've got homefield advantage all but locked up and i think we're just flat out better all the way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...