Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers...


t96

Recommended Posts

Lions aren't gonna make it in the playoffs. Cardinals were the team that scared me the most before Johnson went down for the year. They still would pose a real threat with that strong defense. Seahawks worried me before Graham went down and that secondary stopped playing at an elite (or even good) level. The Giants kind of worry me, since in 2007 they won it all against the Pats as a wild card team and in 2011 they took out the Packers in Lambeau after the Packers went 15-1 with a first round bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We got up on them early too. They're still dangerous.

We're 11-0. Lions are 4-7. Yes they've clearly improved recently but this Green Bay team is just flat out terrible on both sides of the ball. Both their lines are terrible, receivers can't separate or catch the ball and the secondary is garbage. They aren't dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

We're 11-0. Lions are 4-7. Yes they've clearly improved recently but this Green Bay team is just flat out terrible on both sides of the ball. Both their lines are terrible, receivers can't separate or catch the ball and the secondary is garbage. They aren't dangerous.

Disagree. I'd still consider them a tough team.

I will give you that their offensive line is overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Lions aren't gonna make it in the playoffs. Cardinals were the team that scared me the most before Johnson went down for the year. They still would pose a real threat with that strong defense. Seahawks worried me before Graham went down and that secondary stopped playing at an elite (or even good) level. The Giants kind of worry me, since in 2007 they won it all against the Pats as a wild card team and in 2011 they took out the Packers in Lambeau after the Packers went 15-1 with a first round bye.

Just checking to see if you were worried.   Just joking with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Lions aren't gonna make it in the playoffs. Cardinals were the team that scared me the most before Johnson went down for the year. They still would pose a real threat with that strong defense. Seahawks worried me before Graham went down and that secondary stopped playing at an elite (or even good) level. The Giants kind of worry me, since in 2007 they won it all against the Pats as a wild card team and in 2011 they took out the Packers in Lambeau after the Packers went 15-1 with a first round bye.

Johnson is designated to return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...