Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2007 16-0 Patriots vs. 2016 14-0 Panthers


MHS831

Recommended Posts

In the event any of you were curious....

Division Strength: The 2007 Pats hailed from a soft division, as do the Panthers in 2015--but the AFC East was so weak, it makes the NFC South look formidable.  The Bills won 7 games, the Jets won 4, and the Dolphins won 1 game that season--for a combined .250 win percentage.   Currently, the Panther's NFC South opponents' records are 7-7 (Falcons), 6-8 (Bucs) and Saints (5-9), for a win percentage of .428.   

Dominance:  The Patriots played 3 games during the 2007 season that were decided by one score (8 points) or less.  Half of the Panthers games (7) have been decided by one score or less....The Patriots scored a whopping 589 points that season, surrendering only 274 for an incredible +315 difference.  The Panthers are currently at 449 points scored vs.278 for a +171 difference.  If current averages play out, the Panthers will finish with 513 points for the season and will have surrendered 318 for a +195 differential.

Reading the Tea Leaves:  By these numbers, the Panthers do not seem to be as dominant as the 2007 Patriots.  What can be learned from this?  Nothing, unless you consider that the 2007 Patriots did not win the Super Bowl.  Could it be that they were not accustomed to playing in close games? Perhaps.  While I disagree that losing a game is productive, I think winning too easily is counterproductive.  On the other hand, the Panthers have been dancing with the devil all season, and sooner or later, there will be a card to pay.  Think about it--Norman's interception vs. the McCown-led Saints,  TD's interception to halt the Packers, The Olsen TD at Seattle when the defense broke down, Gano's FGs vs. the Colts and Giants, etc.

The point is--the Panthers find ways to win, but they rarely seem to play above the level of their competition.  Will they continue to do so with teams gunning for them?  You all wanted respect--from newspaper reporters to TV announcers--something I never cared about.  Now we have the limelight, and we are not the team we were at the beginning of the season.  What that means remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're pretty much all in at this point fortunately or unfortunately.  The Falcon's game is the last game this year in which we can afford the 'drop one to ease the pressure' since we certainly cannot go into the playoffs coming off a loss to Tampa.  With Ron's shaky off the bye record, every fan would be sleepless for 2 weeks.

Best case scenario is we play 2 full games as if it were preseason game number 3 and win in convincing fashion, resting starters while knowing our 2nd unit can hold onto the lead.

Understandable case scenario is we play our defensive until the final whistle and tune them up for 60 full minutes of football regardless of the score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what you really need to know about the two clubs.  The Patriots had a historically good offense, that started out as tops in the league by far, and steadily got worse as the season progressed.  Their defense was it's typical solid unit, and one that also got a little worse as the season progressed.  Note that the Panthers defense has also gotten worse as the season progressed.

If you plot both defenses against each other, and add trendlines, they both have a surprisingly similar slope (0.4 vs. 0.4).  But the offensive production of Carolina has continually improved where the Patriot's got worse.  The trendlines for those two units (Pats. vs. Carolina) have slopes of -0.7 vs. 1.3.  Basically, the Panthers have improved over the course of the year while the Patriots play declined.  That carried over into the playoffs for them, as they scored 31, 21, and 14 in their three games.

Here are their averages by "quarter" of the season:

  1 2 3 4 16-game Slope
Patriots Off 37 45.75 34.5 30 -0.7
Patriots Def 12 19.75 20.5 16.25 0.4
Panthers Off 27 30 36.25 38 1.3
Panthers Def 17.75 23.5 19.5 17.5 0.4

TL;DR - They got worse, we're getting better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cyberjag said:

Here's what you really need to know about the two clubs.  The Patriots had a historically good offense, that started out as tops in the league by far, and steadily got worse as the season progressed.  Their defense was it's typical solid unit, and one that also got a little worse as the season progressed.  Note that the Panthers defense has also gotten worse as the season progressed.

If you plot both defenses against each other, and add trendlines, they both have a surprisingly similar slope (0.4 vs. 0.4).  But the offensive production of Carolina has continually improved where the Patriot's got worse.  The trendlines for those two units (Pats. vs. Carolina) have slopes of -0.7 vs. 1.3.  Basically, the Panthers have improved over the course of the year while the Patriots play declined.  That carried over into the playoffs for them, as they scored 31, 21, and 14 in their three games.

Here are their averages by "quarter" of the season:

  1 2 3 4 16-game Slope
Patriots Off 37 45.75 34.5 30 -0.7
Patriots Def 12 19.75 20.5 16.25 0.4
Panthers Off 27 30 36.25 38 1.3
Panthers Def 17.75 23.5 19.5 17.5 0.4

TL;DR - They got worse, we're getting better

Great stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frank Hollywood said:

Any info on their entire strength of schedule during their regular season that year and ours this year?

All week I've been hearing from haters saying we have by far the easiest strength of schedule this year even though I don't think we're even in the top 5.

Didnt we have the hardest in the league at the beginning of the season? Thats the only time I think it counts. You can't change poo and make up your own standards as it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frank Hollywood said:

Any info on their entire strength of schedule during their regular season that year and ours this year?

All week I've been hearing from haters saying we have by far the easiest strength of schedule this year even though I don't think we're even in the top 5.

I can't vouch for accuracy, but here is one listing.

http://nfltraderumors.co/nfl-strength-of-schedule-rankings/

Of course, one of the reasons that our opponents appear weak is that they have played us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would add that most of our close games this season involved inclement weather. I'm not professing that we would have won with bigger margins, but rain and slippery conditions really don't do our style of offence any favors and it negates, in large part, the speed of our defense. Dink and dunk/ screens out of the backfield work well because of the momentum gained by the ball carrier.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...