Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are now 6 point favorites!


MVPccaffrey

Recommended Posts

http://www.oddsshark.com/stats/team/football/nfl/59

The line on the big game has moved up to 6 in favor of the Carolina Panthers in some sportsbooks, quite a move from the 3 points we were giving when the line first came out.  Vegas doesn't seem to be nearly impressed with the Broncos as they were with the Cards and Seahawks, who if not for charlotte home field advantage would have been near pickem games.

 

The last SB team who was favored by 6 or more was the 2008 SB winning Steelers.  

 

Given the 45 O/U vegas also expects Broncos to finish under 20 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MadHatter said:

The line has NOTHING to do with how Vegas is impressed with anyone.  They move the line based on how people are betting....to keep even money on both teams.

Correct, this simply means that the gambling public is not impressed with Denver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MadHatter said:

The line has NOTHING to do with how Vegas is impressed with anyone.  They move the line based on how people are betting....to keep even money on both teams.

It will be 7 1/2 by the time media week rolls around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

it's sad that this has to be reinforced on nearly a weekly basis... "vegas loves us, vegas hates us"..... the only love Vegas has is for money and how they can maximize it

True but on a side note...6 is nowhere near enough. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 2jakefansinva said:

Vegas will not lose........thus the adjustments in the line.

they will keep working to get even money

Vegas does lose if they can't balance the line. High probability it will happen this game. Vegas wins in the long run through 1000s of games and their 5-10% fee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...