Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Broncos Fans Are Saying


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

If the Broncos normal run defense (the one that was gashed by KC and Minny for 397 yards in 3 games) shows up then the SB will be a bloodbath of epic proportions. 

 

The Panther's have a much better and vastly more diversified rushing attack then anything that Denver has seen all year. 

It controls the defensive line with out a snap being taken, the front 7 have to pause and identify the runner, the QB, and the option or if it's a pass play. That pause in the defenders allows the Panthers rushing attack to do three things. Eat clock, wear down the defense, and set up the play action passing game. 

 

Blitz or overload and you've already lost, get too aggressive in pass rush and not stay disciplined in gap control and you've already lost. 

Denvers defense will have to do what it hasnt all season (limit a good rushing team) and get constant pressure on Cam without sending extra defenders to win this game. 

That's not even mentioning that Denver's offense plays into the Panthers defensive approach. Just making it that much harder on Denver's defense.

This is the worst possible NFC matchup for Denver's defense and I see no visible evidence based on Denver's past games this season to expect them to suddenly be able to stop a high grade power run team that's in the top ten in rushing. 

 

Edit: just to add a note Carolina ran for 900+ yards and a 151 rushing yards per game average against 3-4 teams in 2015 season.

Edited by carpanfan96
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Broncos defense is not built to stop our offense. We are a bad matchup for them. The Broncos defense is built to stop pass happy AFC teams. We're a brutish NFC team with a monster rushing QB and beastly RB. The Broncos want to muddle at the line and drop into coverage and let their quick speedy DEs get to the QB. That will NOT work on the Panthers. We're going to run the ball, and they can't stop that so they have to load the box. That means single coverage on our WRs like the AZ game. You saw what our WRs did to AZ's good DBs. They were eaten alive.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pantherj said:

The Broncos defense is not built to stop our offense. We are a bad matchup for them. The Broncos defense is built to stop pass happy AFC teams. We're a brutish NFC team with a monster rushing QB and beastly RB. The Broncos want to muddle at the line and drop into coverage and let their quick speedy DEs get to the QB. That will NOT work on the Panthers. We're going to run the ball, and they can't stop that so they have to load the box. That means single coverage on our WRs like the AZ game. You saw what our WRs did to AZ's good DBs. They were eaten alive.

Oh oh, I can answer this, I've heard it so many times from the Bronies. 

'it doesn't matter because you don't have any receivers besides Olsen'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Just from looking at the footage on NFLN it appears that the fans there are 60% 49ers, 30% Broncos, 10% plain clothed. I am worried that most of the stadium will be filled with Bronco fans.

Meh. We've made it a little bit of a habit to send people home sad at away games this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no "home team" in the Super Bowl.  Sadly, the Super Bowl has become such a huge event that the vast majority of tickets are bought up by corporate interests and the wealthy.  There aren't many actual fans at the Super Bowl.  They're there for the event, not so much the two teams on the field.

I will say that living out here in CO, shortly after the teams were decided, most Broncos fans didn't think they had a chance.  They were just hoping to avoid another Super Bowl embarrassment.  That tide has turned.  They're hyped now.  They're gonna be crushed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Prowling Cat said:

Some of the donkey fans are saying its going to be like A "home" game and that their fans will out number ours by a large amount.... LMAO!!!!

you should be prepared for that.  It will be a heavily slanted Denver crowd. 

Denver's fanbase is closer and Denver is going to get a huge chunk of the "corporate" crowd which dominates Super Bowl attendance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CRA said:

you should be prepared for that.  It will be a heavily slanted Denver crowd. 

Denver's fanbase is closer and Denver is going to get a huge chunk of the "corporate" crowd which dominates Super Bowl attendance.

I am not so sure. A good number every year pull for the "cool team". Right now that is the Panthers hands down. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pantherj said:

The Broncos defense is not built to stop our offense. We are a bad matchup for them. The Broncos defense is built to stop pass happy AFC teams. We're a brutish NFC team with a monster rushing QB and beastly RB. The Broncos want to muddle at the line and drop into coverage and let their quick speedy DEs get to the QB. That will NOT work on the Panthers. We're going to run the ball, and they can't stop that so they have to load the box. That means single coverage on our WRs like the AZ game. You saw what our WRs did to AZ's good DBs. They were eaten alive.

Broncos are 3rd against the run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...