Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reviewing recent Gettleman draft picks & their grades


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

This is my first season paying any real attention to mock drafts & draft prospects.  (I'm only paying slight attention at this point..., but that's much more than I've done other offseasons...)

As I look at prospects various mock drafts have falling to us at #30, I found myself not having much frame of reference in terms of the grades...  So, in true stat geek fashion, I went back to look at Gettleman's 2013-2015 drafts and the pre-draft grades (from the NFL.com draft tracker page) for each player we picked.

(The grading system changed in 2014... so it's a bit hard to compare the 2013 grades with those from 2014 & 2015.)

draft.png.d352cf4b78be05c0ff0a60c573fc81

 

With the exception of Tre Boston, graded at 5.1, all of our 2014 & 2015 picks were graded at 5.2 or higher.

Here's how this year's draft stacks up (so far) in terms of numbers of prospects graded at 5.2 or higher (obviously the Combine will change grades, I'll revisit this again in a few weeks....)

2016:  212 players >=  5.2

2015:  235 players >= 5.2

2014:  221 players >= 5.2

 

It wouldn't surprise me to see Gettleman trade our 5th & 7th round picks this year to move up in some round.  (We don't have a 6th round pick, as we traded that for Jared Allen).  4 players would be a very small draft class, but our staff have shown they can also find excellent & productive UDFAs...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'd rather have two dimes than three nickles =)

So I think that's what he's going to do.  Find the best players around our draft position and get them.  FA will fill the basic holes, and it's hard to beat getting the best players.

Now some teams like the Pats and Ravens are notorious for grabbing as many draft picks as possible, which is all fine and great.  Gettleman just isn't that kind of GM.  It's about quality over quantity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the current one from NFL.com

9.00-10 - Once-in-lifetime player

8.00-8.99 - Perennial All-Pro

7.50-7.99 - Future All-Pro

7.00-7.49 - Pro Bowl-caliber player

6.50-6.99 - Chance to become Pro Bowl-caliber player

6.00-6.49 - Should become instant starter

5.50-5.99 - Chance to become NFL starter

5.20-5.49 - NFL backup or special teams potential

5.01-5.19 - Better-than-average chance to make NFL roster

5.0050-50 - Chance to make NFL roster

4.75-4.99 - Should be in an NFL training camp

4.50-4.74 - Chance to be in an NFL training camp

NO GRADE - Likely needs time in developmental league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

It wouldn't surprise me to see Gettleman trade our 5th & 7th round picks this year to move up in some round.  (We don't have a 6th round pick, as we traded that for Jared Allen).  4 players would be a very small draft class, but our staff have shown they can also find excellent & productive UDFAs...

 

" If I have a dollar, I’d rather have the dollar than the three dimes."

I can definitely see them trading up, but they need to be frugal with the limited draft capital. There aren't any significant UFA's on the roster outside of Josh, but they also need young cost controlled talent for the next few years. They will have 27 players under contract for 2017. KK (if they don't get a deal done), Star, Philly, Norwell, Ginn, and AJ Klein will be the notable FAs that season. You can't pay everyone, so it's good to get a head start on finding some young replacements. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I think I'd rather have two dimes than three nickles =)

So I think that's what he's going to do.  Find the best players around our draft position and get them.  FA will fill the basic holes, and it's hard to beat getting the best players.

Now some teams like the Pats and Ravens are notorious for grabbing as many draft picks as possible, which is all fine and great.  Gettleman just isn't that kind of GM.  It's about quality over quantity.

Always thought that was a terrible way to play this game.  BB always gets credit for turning 1 pick into 2 or 3, all the while no one looking back at just how unproductive most of those picks have been.

I would much prefer to have a clear idea of the direction of the franchise, and draft accordingly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thefuzz said:

Always thought that was a terrible way to play this game.  BB always gets credit for turning 1 pick into 2 or 3, all the while no one looking back at just how unproductive most of those picks have been.

I would much prefer to have a clear idea of the direction of the franchise, and draft accordingly.  

It's funny, I remember not too long ago we were in the mindset to stockpile picks around here.  =)  Oh how times have changed!

I completely agree, I like our current direction.  I mean, we went to the Super Bowl when everyone was ready to write us off when KB went down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, d-dave said:

It's funny, I remember not too long ago we were in the mindset to stockpile picks around here.  =)  Oh how times have changed!

I completely agree, I like our current direction.  I mean, we went to the Super Bowl when everyone was ready to write us off when KB went down.  

Same.

I'm not opposed to trading back, as long as you know exactly where you are going, and have a clear idea that the  player/players will be there then....if not damn them.  I don't care if Mel and Mike say we "reached" as long as it's the player that DG wants, and he thought he wouldn't be there if he dropped a few slots.

Much like the Shaq pick, many here started howling immediately that we had reached...I couldn't have cared less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KB_fan said:

This is my first season paying any real attention to mock drafts & draft prospects.  (I'm only paying slight attention at this point..., but that's much more than I've done other offseasons...)

As I look at prospects various mock drafts have falling to us at #30, I found myself not having much frame of reference in terms of the grades...  So, in true stat geek fashion, I went back to look at Gettleman's 2013-2015 drafts and the pre-draft grades (from the NFL.com draft tracker page) for each player we picked.

(The grading system changed in 2014... so it's a bit hard to compare the 2013 grades with those from 2014 & 2015.)

draft.png.d352cf4b78be05c0ff0a60c573fc81

 

With the exception of Tre Boston, graded at 5.1, all of our 2014 & 2015 picks were graded at 5.2 or higher.

Here's how this year's draft stacks up (so far) in terms of numbers of prospects graded at 5.2 or higher (obviously the Combine will change grades, I'll revisit this again in a few weeks....)

2016:  212 players >=  5.2

2015:  235 players >= 5.2

2014:  221 players >= 5.2

 

It wouldn't surprise me to see Gettleman trade our 5th & 7th round picks this year to move up in some round.  (We don't have a 6th round pick, as we traded that for Jared Allen).  4 players would be a very small draft class, but our staff have shown they can also find excellent & productive UDFAs...

 

As far as trades, a precedent was set last year with the Broncos trading a 2015 and 2016 5th to the Lions to move up 5 spots (28 to 23).  Something to keep in mind with the Steelers at 25 who ironically....don't have a 5th round pick.

FAR preferable to the Saints disaster of trading a 3rd to move up to get Cooks when that 3rd could have been Trai Turner.

Our late 7th has such little value this year I honestly don't see it as trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Always thought that was a terrible way to play this game.  BB always gets credit for turning 1 pick into 2 or 3, all the while no one looking back at just how unproductive most of those picks have been.

I would much prefer to have a clear idea of the direction of the franchise, and draft accordingly.  

The Patriots haven't been great at drafting for a while.  Very hit or miss.

They still get good free agents cheap because guys figure they have a good shot at a ring, but I get the sense their long open window is starting to inch toward shutting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Patriots haven't been great at drafting for a while.  Very hit or miss.

They still get good free agents cheap because guys figure they have a good shot at a ring, but I get the sense their long open window is starting to inch toward shutting.

 

Agreed.  I think that we may see a Duncan/Pop riding off into the sunset together with Brady and BB.

They both know that they couldn't do it alone, and Brady is starting to show some wear and tear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for getting rid of 7th round picks every year. Start working the phones earlier. Unfortunately, a 7th may help us move up in...the 7th round? 6th maybe (where we won't pick)?  Doubt we'll see a lot of action this year unless there's a magical trade down or future picks get involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...